Seriously, way too many games are just generic garbage that advertise only on “look how realistic my game is, you’re not a true gamer if the games you play don’t make your computer sound like a jet engine!”
Comment on Anon is a game dev
TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
I will never understand the obsession around graphics. JUST MAKE IT FUN.
_AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 hours ago
lazyViking@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Graphics can be part of the fun. What’s do difficult to understand?
Hupf@feddit.org 23 hours ago
Graphics and jiggly physics.
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 17 hours ago
And the most fun graphics are stylized graphics!
matlag@sh.itjust.works 22 hours ago
It looks so marketing driven.
We are in decades of video games. Look at very old game and assess how “ugly” they are by today’s standard while at their time they were “the best graphics ever seen in history!” or something.
And so, the big question: we were having fun with games decades ago already. If graphics were part of the fun, your brain should explode under the immensely higher level of fun you have on modern games vs 20y old games. And… well…nope. Same as before, just higher expectations.
lazyViking@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Are you perhaps retarded? Do you not understand that expectations change with current technology? Daily life must be immensely difficult for you
TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 hours ago
very well said. I think the last time i got excited about graphics was when Final Fantasy X came out lol. then they kept getting more realistic but never actually became real, they stayed video games. even VR. so… maybe graphics are what we need to keep working on
forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 4 hours ago
Games going for that uncanny valley aesthetic and not being nearly as efficient. I don’t want a 1000W PSU just to run my graphics card.
ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Good graphics are fine, but not at the expense of creativity and fun.
Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip 23 hours ago
Of course, I don’t want my game to look like utter dogshit, and graphics can be apart of the fun, but my biggest concerns with games are how they play and what the story/characters is like (if it’s that type of game).
There can be times that I can appreciate more realistic looking games, but honestly it’s boring to see so many games try the same style over and over again, especially when it isn’t executed well. And if worrying about graphics causes my game to be an unoptimized game with a lackluster story, then I’d rather people just stick with a less detailed style to preserve the the fun (imo) part of games, which is literally everything else.
capuccino@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
REbirth sure does look better than Fortnite, and REbirth sure does need a ton less of GPU and CPU.
lazyViking@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
It looks like dog shit, what the fuck are you talking about
chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 9 minutes ago
Here’s the reason AAA devs are obsessed with graphics:
It’s the only thing that differentiates them from indie devs.
Once you realize that indie devs can do anything and everything that a AAA game can do, except for creating tons of high detail 3D models, levels, and textures, you begin to see the AAA studio’s dilemma. If they don’t hire all those artists, level designers, and animators then they’re forced to compete with indie devs on gameplay, story, and features — none of which they can do!
Why is that? Because there are millions of indie game devs out there who are willing to spend many years of their lives trying out ideas that have close to zero chance of being successful and all the gamers out there are happy to pick that one in a million game which actually succeeds! For a AAA studio to step into that arena would be absolutely foolish.
It’s the same reason big corporations dominate book publishing but they don’t even bother trying to write books themselves.