Also completely neglecting that not all the energy in a slap will be transferred to thermal energy in the chicken.
Comment on Chickenslap
sm1dger@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Typical physicist, ignoring enthalpy of phase changes. Starting from 1C defrosted makes a huge difference from 0C as the melting takes up a ton more energy/slaps. Their underslapped chicken would give you salmonella
thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Balthazar@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Assume a spherical chicken…
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
tbf modern commercial chickens are basically spherical, the poor bastards
ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
And the phase change from uncooked to cooked.
marius@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Where do I find cooked in the phase diagram?
zedgeist@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
🤔
icelimit@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Slap the salmon
untorquer@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
They haven’t considered rate of slap. Significant heat transfer to environment even at 10 slaps per second.
They’re also assuming sea level standard atmospheric conditions. You may need to reduce rate of slap at altitude.
marius@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Also only about half the heat goes into the chicken and the other half into the hand used for slapping
untorquer@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I believe we’re well on our way to developing the worlds first slap coefficient.
Natanael@infosec.pub 3 weeks ago
This assumes both have the same amount of heat capacity * mass. A hand with heat insulating gloves would also significantly reduce heat loss.
Better do it in a vacuum though, you’ll lose energy to air resistance