Holy shit! There’s a bunch of poor homeless kids that are starving!
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Comment on I'm gonna mute this one
PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 21 hours ago
Think of the kids.
But don’t do anything.
Holy shit! There’s a bunch of poor homeless kids that are starving!
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Yep. This is what happens when you bleeding heart assholes stop the school shooters, bullying-to-suicide, and ecumenical rape. The whole ecosystem gets out of whack.
This year, we couldn’t even find enough people to take all the hunting licenses.
It’s estimated that 20% (1 in 5) orphans go straight to being homeless at 18. Homelessness is becoming illegal. Banning abortions ups the number of orphans… Which ups the homeless population, which in turn will up the incarceration numbers.
Our plan to fix any of it? To make cuts to social services.
Our plan to fix any of it?
What do you mean, “fix it?” The prison slave labor system is working exactly as intended.
Eventually the homeless kids will go to jail and become productive members of society modern slave labor
Right. It’s just insane.
Obviously you need to ban abortion, but if you arent sacrificing those children to moloch, what is even the point of society?
Like, im all for cutting social services, but you need to follow it up with proper ritual!
Your fascist anger, nurses me. Please, tell me more about how angry I make you.
I live for nothing else
Maybe if you owned a proper Ford F50000 Fleshreaper (BLOOD FOR THE CAR GOD™) you would have your own tiny body count, instead of being high on train fumes all the time. Mwybe moloch would love you, then.
You do realize they’re joking right?
What?! Lemme get outraged and blame the parents, then post some Facebook comments about how outraged I am!
My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
“No kid should ever have to sleep on the streets, so we made it borderline impossible for them to physically do so. Hopefully their bootstraps figure out someplace they can sleep, because we sure as hell didn’t. You’re welcome.”
Tja@programming.dev 4 hours ago
It’s more like “no kid should ever sleep on the streets so we provide them with shelter and support”, but that doesn’t make a good internet rant m
grue@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Except for the part where, in reality, they didn’t actually do that.
Tja@programming.dev 1 hour ago
My knowledge is limited to a short wikipedia scan, but I didn’t see any reason to doubt they do it. Feel free to link some info if you know better.
My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
It would be nice to see shelter and support being provided, rather than a bisected bench designed to discourage the ability to comfortably lie down for a night’s rest.
Tja@programming.dev 1 hour ago
As far as a quick Google search goes, support seems to be provided, they offer 2000 shelter spots across north America.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Instead the message is "no child should ever sleep on the streets. We made it impossible to sleep on this bench because it’s for people we want here.
Tja@programming.dev 1 hour ago
So you would prefer that there is no shelter and more benches for homeless children?
I think the message is perfectly clear, and people online are just looking for reasons to be upset (not that they would do something about it, just posting angrily).
jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 17 hours ago
Maybe the populous should have been more specific then
Hadriscus@jlai.lu 17 hours ago
I believe populace means the people, whereas populous is an adjective that’s a synonym of crowded
My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
I suppose “populous” could be contextually nounified in niche circumstances.