Does a British financial analyst who basically says the same thing.
If you can actually manage debt make sure to get some. And then pay it off.
Comment on Anon calls in for financial advice
cm0002@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Dave Ramsey’s advice is only ever applicable to those who are terrible with self-control. If you have at least mediocre self-control, carefully managed debt can be a boon
echodot@feddit.uk 1 week ago
neshura@bookwormstory.social 6 days ago
One example: If you get to own a house (that’s paid off) not having debt on it is stupid because you get the lowest interest a regular person possibly can get. Even if everyone else has interest rates up to their mouth you’ll get a rate so cushy investing the money in any index fund will outperform your interest payments.
arrow74@lemm.ee 6 days ago
Disagree, sure you can make more in the open market over time by getting another mortgage on a paid off home.
But that invested money means absolutely nothing if the market has a downturn and you lose your job. Now you’re on the hook to a mortgage you can’t pay and risk losing a place to live.
While on paper you can make more money, it’s very dumb to gamble with things you need to survive. And that’s all any loan is, a gamble that you will be in good health and have the means to pay it back.
echodot@feddit.uk 6 days ago
Yeah when he’s talking about debt he means small scale stuff like credit card debt. Basically you buy your groceries on your credit card rather than your debit card even though you could buy them on your debit card.
The reasoning being is that that way you get an extra month of interest before you have to pay out, and you get a good credit score since you always pay off your loans. Which weirdly is actually better than having no credit score at all because you’ve never had any debt.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 days ago
That really depends on how risk averse you are, what your payment is, and how stable your job is. For example, my payment is tiny because I got a great rate, bought below my means, and have owned it for several years (so inflation is doing its thing). At this point, I spend more on food than I do on my house.
To mitigate risk, I keep a sizable emergency fund (sustain lifestyle for 6 months), which is currently invested in very safe bonds and money market funds returning a higher rate than my mortgage rate. Why would I pay down my mortgage when I can get more essentially risk free in bonds?
I really like Dave’s question: if you had a paid off house, would you get a mortgage on it? My answer is, hell yeah if I could get the same rate I have now! It’s free money!
If my rate was >5%, I’d pay it down aggressively. But it’s way below that, so I’m holding it until I have enough to retire.
neshura@bookwormstory.social 6 days ago
There is a distinct difference between taking out a loan on your house and saddling it 100% with debt again. Obviously any loan taken out should under all circumstances be one you can comfortably pay back.
Taking out 20k on a 1m home is way different than taking out 20k on a 100k home.
Plus, at least here, if you lose your job the following happens:
- for 2 years you’ll get 80% of your previous paycheck (assuming you worked long enough to qualify, iirc 5 years. if not you get time deducted)
- at the same time as the end of your current employment you have the option to stop/reduce payments on the loan for a time due to special circumstances (technically not mandatory but not bank will give you a large loan without this added insurance, iirc interest will still accrue in this time essentially extending the length of the loan)
Couple that with not being stupid and getting a loan that eats your entire home as backing and you are pretty much safe from any short term disruption in your finances.
To touch on a few other points:
- yes blindly investing is dumb, if the market gives you an uneasy gut don’t invest. That thing has a habit of being wildly irrational until it suddenly and very quickly is forced to realign with reality
- if you have the luck and are in a union that negotiates your wages you will likely receive a “pay rise” aka inflation compensation every couple of years, in such a case a loan as I describe it also makes sense for personal use (in small sums) because inflation will further reduce the interest. Think taking out a loan to renovate a room instead of saving up for it, after everything is properly accounted for the loan backed by property variant will leave you with slightly more money (depending on general interest situation, if interest rates are high but inflation low things might differ)
And worst comes to worst, rent out a room in your house as a sublet and use that to pay exclusively for the mortgage. Any loan you ever take out against an owned home shouldn’t have higher monthly payments than that anyway or it, as you say, turns into an insane gamble no one in their right mind should take.
oxideseven@lemmy.ca 6 days ago
Dave Ramsey is a bigotted, sexist, racist piece of shit who got rich running mega churches. Ie: scamming people and the government.
He’s fired people because they’ve have children out of wedlock. The whole company is a cult.
BuckenBerry@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Doesn’t that describe pretty much everyone in finance
GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 6 days ago
The average person in finance has different flaws than this particular douchebag.
spicytuna62@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Hi. I’m an person in finance. Fuck Dave Ramsey. He gives decent financial advice, but the way he shoehorns God into financial matters so frequently was off-putting to me, even when I was a Christian. That, and he’s a racist, bigoted POS.
If you’re in the middle class, his baby steps are somewhat solid stuff, though.
But saving six months’ expenses and paying off your house early…yeah, that’s not feasible for at least 70% people. Especially renters.
The truth is Dave’s screeners do not let anyone through if his program can’t help them. I mean, a single parent in a rural town whose boss won’t pay them enough to survive and whose economic prospects are so limited that “just get a better job” will never work because there aren’t any. People who must rely on the generosity of others to get by and will be completely fucked if they lose their government assistance. Or worse - their job. There’s no financial advice that can help them. Because we live under an economic system that can’t operate if those at the bottom aren’t going through untold suffering and can be helped by “drive an old car, eat beans and rice, and just get a better job.”
At that point, it’s not the fault of the person. It’s the fault of the system. Dave isn’t the problem, but he’s certainly a complication.