Ah but remember that AI no longer means the what it has meant since the dawn of computing, it now means “I don’t understand the algorithm, therefore it’s AI”.
Hell, AI used to mean mundane things like A* pathfinding, which is in like, every game ever.
I’m really tired of the shift in what AI means.
parlaptie@feddit.org 1 week ago
Procedural generation is generative, but it ain’t AI. It especially has nothing in common with the exploitative practices of genAI training.
Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 week ago
It makes decisions.
It generates content.
Railcar8095@lemm.ee 1 week ago
It doesn’t make decisions, but neither does Gen AI. Not sure if you’re doubly wrong or half right.
But it’s not Gen AI.
parlaptie@feddit.org 1 week ago
As I touched on previously, those aren’t the qualities that make people opposed to AI. But have fun arguing dictionary definitions.
jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
By this logic, any literally any code is genAI.
Has a branch statement? It makes decisions. Displays something on the screen, even by stdout? Generated content.
Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 1 week ago
“AI” is just very advanced procedural generation. There’s been games that used image diffusion in the past too, just in a far smaller and limited scale (such as a single creature, like the pokemon with the spinning eyes
Probius@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
To me, what makes the difference is whether or not it’s trained on other people’s shit. The distinction between AI and an algorithm is pretty arbitrary, but I wouldn’t consider, for example, procedural generation via the wave function collapse algorithm to have the same moral implications as selling something using what most people would call AI-generated content.
Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 1 week ago
And if you train an open source model yourself so it can generate content specifically on work you’ve created? Or are you against certain Linux devices too?