Most of them? 0.
Heck, most of them will sit there in the library list forgotten, to be absentmindedly scrolled past in five years’ time with the thought “I really should install that game and give it a try… someday…”
Comment on Anon goes to the casino
LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 days ago
And how many hours will you play those games?
NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 2 days ago
ddplf@szmer.info 2 days ago
Mmm, yes, the blessed consumptionism
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
I blame bundles. I’ll go to Fanatical or Humble or something and see 1-2 games I want to try, then buy the whole bundle. I’m lucking if I actually play those 1-2 games from the bundle…
That said, I’ve found some great games that way, so I think I get value from it. But the number of games I have vs games I have actually played is a depressingly low ratio, but I think I spend less than I would if I only bought the games I was about to play.
Trollception@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Depends on how long you play until you run into a game breaking bug and realize you’re now SOL.
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Exactly. Videogames are some of the best value for entertainment you can find. There are a couple of games in my steam library that have cost me a few cents per hour of fun.
Zana@startrek.website 1 day ago
Paradox games, even with all the DLC, I get thousands of hours out of them. I definitely get my money’s worth that I don’t mind spending $20 on them every few months.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Exactly. So many people hate on them for their DLC policy, but if it’s your jam, having a game get freshened up every year for $15-20 or whatever for another few hundred hours is totally worth it.
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Especially if you compare them to a casino.
Klear@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I bought Sharknado VR for half a dollar. Took less than half an hour to beat that mess. Money well spent.