Yeah, but there’s a stereotype that conservatism is only a boomer thing, so OP providing an example of a millennial also having a shitty view actually helps.
Comment on [deleted]
Diddlydee@feddit.uk 13 hours ago
The year you were born does not define your views. I detest these arbitrary year-based labels.
puchaczyk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 hours ago
WoodScientist@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Screw it! We need to go younger. That’s right, it’s Logan’s Run time! Everyone over 30 gets euthanized. And I say this as someone over 30 myself.
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Nice try, Menudo
essell@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
The year you were born does not define your views.
But it can serve to predict it.
Whilst any individual within an arbitrary age bracket can be anything, trends and statistics for those age brackets can be measured and proven.
This is true for age with a much stronger effect than hair colour, because of the material impact it has on the cultural, economic and environmental factors which inform a person’s assumptions, experience and perception of norms.
yetiftw@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
this is the same logic used to justify racism fwiw
essell@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
No, it isn’t.
Statistics are not value judgements.
They’re often used to justify racism but they’re still innocent.
bluesunset@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
tias@discuss.tchncs.de 13 hours ago
But by including that you imply that there is a causality relationship. You didn’t share his hair color even if that would also be more descriptive.
bassomitron@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
But people often see this type of viewpoint and assume it’s a boomer or something. I think it’s important to show that these gross views span multiple age demographics.
Starbuck@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
I think they included it to say that their person espousing this view isn’t older, like a boomer of gen-x-er.