Comment on The lost days
sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 2 months agoYep!
britannica.com/…/ten-days-that-vanished-the-switc…
This is not some kind of software bug, it actually reflects how the real, western calendar system was intentionally designed.
Don’t let modern doomsday cults/prophets know about it though, wouldn’t want to further confuse their Bible Math.
Other quirks of our calendar system:
There is no year 0.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_zero
Goes straight from 1 BC to 1 AD.
This is why the new millenium actually began in 2001, not 2000.
Also, Jesus probably wasn’t born in 1AD. as a matter of fact is 1AD the year after Christmas where Jesus was born (so he was born in 1BC) or was Jesus not born for the vast majority of 1AD until a week before the end of year?
Crazy what assimilating pagan holidays will do to a religion
Jesus was born in the spring, not the winter. Christmas is an adaptation of northern winter festivities and they slapped a Christian justification on it.
I always thought it was the christian brand version of Roman Saturnalia.
When they were still being persecuted by the Romans for their religion, they held Christmas during Saturnalia to blend in.
Also, I’m pretty sure I remember seeing that Tolkien had Frodo destroy the ring on the day believed to be the birth of Christ.
Jesus was never real and was not recorded by dozens of scribes that were in the place at the same time (one famous example was debunked hundreds of years ago). He’s a sun-god astrological myth, like Horus and others before and they all share similar attributes.
His purpose was to signal the start of the age of Pisces (two fish), and the winter solstice will see the sun rise (after 3 days of apparent stagnation) in the Aquarius constellation in 2150 or so. His resurrection is celebrated at Spring equinox, or Easter, when the sun finally overpowers the darkness.
And that’s if they had managed to get Jesus’s birth year right, but he was actually born a couple of years BC
Can’t believe we skipped both 0 BC and 0 AD.
In all seriousness, we can define the millennium to start on 2000 and work from there. We already do this with decades and centuries.
Just happened to help my 9yo with his homework and they’re learning that centuries are defined as starting at year 1 and ending with a 0.
101 200
1401 1500
Etc
But it’s arbitrary. It doesn’t need to. Centuries are just 100 years. Start at years ending in one or zero.
it’s arbitrary
Start at […] one or zero.
Coward. My century starts at 54
WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Yo some poor programmer had to manually code this in there
amon@lemmy.world 2 months ago
whilst being screamed at by SJ to get it done
dan@upvote.au 1 month ago
Most developers don’t write their own date handling code; they instead use code that someone else already wrote.
BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 1 month ago
Right, but the original person who wrote the code everyone uses still had to program it in.
dan@upvote.au 1 month ago
True, but the common libraries for date/time handling are widely used and heavily tested.
aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
No such thing