FiskFisk33
@FiskFisk33@startrek.website
- Comment on "Me Ug! Ug feel ACADEMIC!" 6 hours ago:
- Comment on Anon wants $3 million 2 days ago:
well, better as in more effective.
Just don’t forget to engage the safety squints.
- Comment on Anon wants $3 million 3 days ago:
an angle grinder would be a much better choice than hammers
- Comment on sterile rot 1 week ago:
ok.
…WHY?!
- Comment on What Refutes Science... 1 week ago:
Counterexamples only go so far. What you really need is counterexamples, and an analysis of their implications, including a probability study.
In other words, well, science.
- Comment on Anon reads Harry Potter 1 week ago:
If you stopped at Ganondorf, you had already missed Gandalf ;D
- Comment on idijt 2 weeks ago:
The “shining” nature of diamonds is not due to their reflective properties, it’s due to how they refract.
- Comment on Mozilla's New AI Detector Add-On for Firefox 2 weeks ago:
That would be great, but AI detection doesn’t work reliably at all.
- Comment on When you see it.... 2 weeks ago:
I need to cut down on my internet consumption.
- Comment on Anon introduces himself 3 weeks ago:
In Swedish? just a name, with unfortunate significance in the english language.
- Comment on Anon introduces himself 3 weeks ago:
Fanny is a semi common forename in Sweden.
- Comment on Multiverse 3 weeks ago:
this is stupid. The existence of an infinite number of universes does not at all imply they must represent infinite variability.
- Comment on This one is going to be controversial 3 weeks ago:
it wouldn’t be much of a joke if we didn’t pretend to take it seriously no?
- Comment on Anon experiences German humor 4 weeks ago:
“To meet” translates to “treffen” in German. Which can also mean “to hit something or somebody”.
Join the shooting club, meet new friends.
- Comment on Anon is in trouble 4 weeks ago:
that’s fair, I more meant the sheer amount of it though
- Comment on Anon is in trouble 4 weeks ago:
wtf is that product, oo can’t be the only one misunderstanding it
- Comment on Cat 5 weeks ago:
as far as I understand, the only way we know is that we have observed that they move slower than light, and therefore must have mass
- Comment on Anon goes on holiday 1 month ago:
“streets crammed with tourists”
- Comment on Anon goes on holiday 1 month ago:
wha? no?
- Comment on Anon goes on holiday 1 month ago:
it absolutely is.
- Comment on Anon's PC works 1 month ago:
it all depends on what you want to do with it, if it works for your use case all the better!
- Comment on Anon discovers Japanese jazz 1 month ago:
They remind me of Gran Turismo
- Comment on Anon is in a simulation 1 month ago:
I disagree. Landlines used to have near zero latency, modern phone calls often have north of 100ms.
- Comment on Duh 1 month ago:
Vladislav, baby don’t hurt me
- Comment on Switching teams in middle of a match!? 1 month ago:
I didn’t know humans could exhibit endianness
- Comment on Nom nom 1 month ago:
big side, big number
- Comment on Anon hates smartphones 2 months ago:
For someone sharing OP’s opinion, simply “not using it” wouldn’t solve anything. Most of the problems OP lists is stems from that people in general use them.
I’m not saying you should agree with OP, but your argument misses the point.
- Comment on Heavy Metals 2 months ago:
fair enough!
- Comment on Heavy Metals 2 months ago:
organic iron plates, not plates of organic iron.
the plates are generated by an organic process, not out of organic materials.
you can’t just remove a word from the context and act as if that doesn’t change the meaning.
- Comment on Percentages 2 months ago:
Fair enough, I’m inclined to agree. It’s a relatively common error though, still leaving it ambiguous outside of circles where you expect people to express themselves with mathematical precision.
