Shizrak

@Shizrak@sh.itjust.works

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[META] Actually Infuriating Community⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  No, I decided that your statement was something a horrible tyrant would say. There’s a difference. I’m guessing you’re actually pretty decent, but wanted to address what I felt was a horrible statement that only an insane person would utter.

  Your example is pretty vague, and I can’t say for certain that the user in question was in the wrong, but it at least sounds like you did the right thing.

  Initially it sounded like you were banhammering people without them knowing what they did wrong, but at least in this example, you warned the user first, so it seems as though you did right. If it was always like that, my apologies for misinterpreting what you said.

  Have a good one.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[META] Actually Infuriating Community⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  ::shrugs:: we both agree that the other is the problem. Have fun with your power tripping.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[META] Actually Infuriating Community⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  The statements

  “don’t be afraid to ban somebody just because they didn’t explicitly violate a rule”

  And

  “Oh, just ban whoever even if they didn’t break any rules”

  Use different words but end up in the same place.

  So how is it grossly misrepresenting anything?

  Perhaps you can give an example of when someone didn’t break any rules and you felt justified banning them and why, and maybe I’ll sympathize a little.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[META] Actually Infuriating Community⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  I mean, I think you sound ridiculous… So agree to disagree there.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[META] Actually Infuriating Community⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Reply to edit:

  Nope. Just don’t like petty authoritarians.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[META] Actually Infuriating Community⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Oh, it’s hyperbolic, but it gets the point across.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[META] Actually Infuriating Community⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Oh I’m sure you have a way to justify your corrupt authoritarianism. I don’t care what your reasoning is. If you ban people without them breaking rules, then the only actual rule is “don’t upset the power tripping bastards”, which I strongly disagree with.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[META] Actually Infuriating Community⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  How is this upvoted so much? This is fucking insane.

  “Oh, just ban whoever even if they didn’t break any rules”

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Time to chop wood⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Just finished chopping a bunch wood. I don’t get it /s

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Justice should be equal⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  When we have protests large enough to get noticed, we get attacked by the police. Why should the protesters have to suffer? Make the oppressors suffer instead.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨It's true⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  This is what one would expect Plain Simple Garak the Tailor to say.

  Out loud.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨CEO brains go brrrrr⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Huh. TIL. Had always seen consciousness or conscious mind.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨CEO brains go brrrrr⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Not seeing it. Please explain.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨CEO brains go brrrrr⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  You’re right, and it’s spelled conscience.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨DnD⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  So one of my group had us fight a Garbage Mound which was a custom shambling mound. To hit it, players had to roll under its AC. Thankfully our friend Kevin rolled 1,2,5,1 and soloed it.