Comment on [META] Actually Infuriating Community
Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 1 week agoOh I’m sure you have a way to justify your corrupt authoritarianism. I don’t care what your reasoning is. If you ban people without them breaking rules, then the only actual rule is “don’t upset the power tripping bastards”, which I strongly disagree with.
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Reply to edit:
Nope. Just don’t like petty authoritarians.
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
The statements
“don’t be afraid to ban somebody just because they didn’t explicitly violate a rule”
And
“Oh, just ban whoever even if they didn’t break any rules”
Use different words but end up in the same place.
So how is it grossly misrepresenting anything?
Perhaps you can give an example of when someone didn’t break any rules and you felt justified banning them and why, and maybe I’ll sympathize a little.
Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Oh, it’s hyperbolic, but it gets the point across.
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
I mean, I think you sound ridiculous… So agree to disagree there.