Comment on [META] Actually Infuriating Community
Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks agoOh I’m sure you have a way to justify your corrupt authoritarianism. I don’t care what your reasoning is. If you ban people without them breaking rules, then the only actual rule is “don’t upset the power tripping bastards”, which I strongly disagree with.
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 5 weeks ago
Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
Reply to edit:
Nope. Just don’t like petty authoritarians.
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 5 weeks ago
Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
The statements
“don’t be afraid to ban somebody just because they didn’t explicitly violate a rule”
And
“Oh, just ban whoever even if they didn’t break any rules”
Use different words but end up in the same place.
So how is it grossly misrepresenting anything?
Perhaps you can give an example of when someone didn’t break any rules and you felt justified banning them and why, and maybe I’ll sympathize a little.
Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
Oh, it’s hyperbolic, but it gets the point across.
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 5 weeks ago
Shizrak@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
I mean, I think you sound ridiculous… So agree to disagree there.