Photonic
@Photonic@lemmy.world
- Comment on Do americans living in Red States really despise american living in Blue States? 23 hours ago:
Cognitive dissonance
- Comment on How polite 1 day ago:
Ooh look who it is, talking about dicks again!
- Comment on I warned you 2 days ago:
- Comment on I may be wrong here. Isn't AI only as smart as the user putting in the information or commands? What's the big deal? 2 days ago:
Yes, but non-AI users can become AI users. Women can’t become a fully biological male with l XY chromosomes.
Maybe you should look at it more like GLP-1 agonists. They work in obese and overweight people, but don’t cause much weight loss in normal-weight people. But there is no reason to assume they won’t work in people that are now of normal weight when they become overweight.
- Comment on I may be wrong here. Isn't AI only as smart as the user putting in the information or commands? What's the big deal? 2 days ago:
Well that’s because women usually don’t have a dick. That is a big difference.
I said there is no reason to assume non-AI users would behave differently. If you have a reason to assume non-AI users would behave differently you should state that reason. Now it’s just an empty statement of “that doesn’t work”.
- Comment on I may be wrong here. Isn't AI only as smart as the user putting in the information or commands? What's the big deal? 2 days ago:
You’re reading too much into this…. It was a joke my man
But yes, often times results in a certain subset of people are extrapolated to people at large. That is how nearly every study in humans is done.
- Comment on I may be wrong here. Isn't AI only as smart as the user putting in the information or commands? What's the big deal? 2 days ago:
Well we are talking about AI users so those are the people we were talking about. But there is no reason to assume the non-AI users are very different
- Comment on What's the difference between ignorance and stupidity? 3 days ago:
I feel most of the comments split these two apart too. I mean yes, in the most basic form ignoro means to not know. Which seems innocuous enough in its elf, but a lot of ignorant people will often not admit (be it to themselves or others) that they’re ignorant. And I don’t know whether that’s stubbornness, stupidity, pride or whatever.
Now we’re seeing more and more people who feel cool and tough about themselves because of their ignorance.
People, like AI , can state bullshit with such conviction it may even fool other ignorant and stupid people. Meanwhile people actually might have a good idea or something to say get laughed at. Providing back up for your statements with evidence Is useless in this post-truth
- Comment on I may be wrong here. Isn't AI only as smart as the user putting in the information or commands? What's the big deal? 3 days ago:
Stupid people
My man just made a statement that calls at least 90% of people worldwide stupid. I don’t know if that’s a record, but it’s something.
- Comment on I made the Tesseract shitlist! 3 days ago:
I reckon, with that username, OP will also be on some federal lists
- Comment on I have le moosells 4 days ago:
There really is nothing there in his muscles. It’s all synthol oil, fibro-fatty replacement of muscle fibers and edema due to the inflammatory response. He is flexing his muscles for the picture but that hardly does anything anymore because his severely weakened muscle structure. It really is sad
- Comment on What did shrek do? 5 days ago:
But more importantly: what did The Hague do?
- Comment on The savings are trickling down to us 5 days ago:
Sooooo close
- Comment on There's a Jimothy born every minute 5 days ago:
Are you not entertained???!!!
- Comment on get a job you loser 5 days ago:
As I said before: get lost troll
- Comment on get a job you loser 5 days ago:
So you started out with annoying and bad faith and you’re ending it the same way… your parents must be so proud of you. If only the reading proficiency could get a little better…
- Comment on 5 days ago:
Just have a Jos Brinkie and call it a night
- Comment on get a job you loser 5 days ago:
I thought you were done? Or is spamming your new tactic now all else has failed?
- Comment on get a job you loser 6 days ago:
QED indeed, or, as someone else phrased it:
Gosh darn reality making things hard.
- Comment on get a job you loser 6 days ago:
Do you have words of your own?
- Comment on get a job you loser 6 days ago:
Nice “no u” again, but you have yourself to blame for this.
Next time maybe don’t start off in bad faith and see where that leads you.
- Comment on get a job you loser 6 days ago:
Was that pretty confusing for you without the apostrophe?
Just helping you on your way towards literacy. You’re welcome!
I have
Really? Where? Show me all those incredible arguments you made!
the jobs that give back to humanity and pay a livable wage are hard to get.
Are they? You haven’t shown that. All you did was get worked up about the salary of teachers in some states in the US, which I never even denied.
you did a shit job. I even deconstructed it for you.
More empty statements from the guy that can’t even read. Yeah I’m gonna be a no on that one.
This isn’t moving the goal posts. This is the literal definition of a livable wage.
Really? Being able to have a house without roommates is in the definition?
And if you started out with “food and shelter”, this is quite literally the (in this case real) definition of moving the goal posts.You dont? I’m trying to argue that many many teachers don’t get paid a living wage. Are you illiterate or something?
Nice no u. No, if you actually would have used your brain you might have figured out that the point is: why are you trying to argue for something that I already acknowledged in my second comment, the one you responded to, as if I’m denying that teachers are underpaid?
The fact that these jobs don’t exist, or are hard to get
They do exist and are not hard to get. Have you even tried?
trying to derail it to shit on me.
LOL there is no derailing a conversation that starts with:
Gosh darn reality making things hard.
Train was off the tracks with both wheels right from the start.
The premise was that the jobs that are both fulfilling and pay decently were hard to get.
Was it? Where did the OP say that? Please use direct quotes.
Assertion fallacy.
Yeah that’s not what that is LOL but nice try there buddy!
- Comment on get a job you loser 6 days ago:
I’ve understood
Doubt.
The comment were referring
We’re*
And you can pick whichever you want. You still haven’t made a case why any of them are ignorant. Using the word doesn’t make it so.So to be clear, everybody who is not dead or homeless is making a living wage? Is that your argument?
Well…
Mm yes, he forgot to mention the silly extra requirements of food and shelter.
… apparently it’s yours. Which is why the reductio ad absurdum was mine, but nice try at trying to make it seem like you can read.
to be your standard
Still nope, see above.
Mine is that they should be able to afford reasonable shelter and food without having to find roommates or other external sources of income.
More movement of the goal posts I see… whatever happened to food and shelter?
Why do you keep generalizing it to “all”?
What’s your point? Why shouldn’t I generalize? We don’t know the financial situation of each teacher so we can only speak in general terms.
And for the umpteenth time: it’s not about the teachers, or the nurses, or whatever job. The fact that teachers are underpaid is something I already addressed in the comment you responded to. So I don’t know what you’re trying to argue.
The premise was that the jobs were hard to find. They are not. Period.
- Comment on get a job you loser 6 days ago:
Sorry so it was a joke or not? Or is this a joke now.
I clearly wrote, for the third time now: the word illiterate was a joke about your lack of understanding a simple written sentence.
I guess I could have been nicer when replyto your ignorant comment.
Maybe you’re hallucinating things now. There was nothing ignorant about my comment. Your sarcastic bullshit was simply asinine right off the bat. I was having a chat with that other guy and here you come barging in, your idiocy on full display. You’re not projecting that shit on me. Get it away from me.
This is not an example of moving the goal posts. This was a clear and obvious example of showing you how bad your argument was.
Specifically, it’s a logical fallacy called denying the antecedent.
Eg if A then B
DOES NOT imply that
If NOT A then NOT BIf they’re not dead it means they’re living. If they’re not homeless it means they have a home.
It was a reductio ad absurdum, and like I said, not questions one should really answer.In many many parts of the us, this is simply not a living wage. It’s borderline poverty.
Teachers are living perfectly normal lives and they are not all on the brink of poverty. Sure they don’t drive the nicest car, but if that is what you think is important, just go work for Evil inc. instead.
- Comment on get a job you loser 6 days ago:
So to be clear you “know what illiterate means” and you’re gonna double down on how you think I’m illiterate?
Figuratively yes. (It was a joke, like I said before, but which you apparently also failed to read).
Despite all the evidence to the contrary?
Not that I’ve seen.
It was not a rhetorical question.
So you really wanted me to answer whether I was moving goal posts or forgetting? Uhhuhh…
Wow ok then. Didn’t realize you knew so much about most people. Thanks for the evidence.
No problem.
Man, you just fuckin love irony/projection huh?
So you think starting out with:
Gosh darn reality making things hard.
…puts you in the good-faith zone? Yeah I don’t think I’m the one projecting here. LOL
I don’t. Do you think that either of these would be necessary for it to be a non living wage? Do you think all people that work for minimum wage die or live on the street? Or do you think that minimum wage is a living wage?
It’s hardly minimum wage. This is a nice example of moving the goal posts. I won’t move with you.
Oops my bad. What was the thing I’m not getting?
That 50k/yr is a living wage and there are plenty of people who start out with that salary and do fine. And they earn more over the years.
- Comment on get a job you loser 6 days ago:
Are you deliberately moving the goalposts or just forgetting the context?
Neither, I was resetting the goal posts to their original position after your movement of them.
Which simple words in the English language do you believe I don’t understand?
The words I wrote in the comment before that.
Also, remind me what it is that you’ve proved?
That you can’t read for shit. Either that, or you’re arguing in bad faith. I’m on the fence.
Do you not know what illiterate means?
I do.
(Note: the questions you asked are what’s called “rhetorical questions”. People are not supposed to answer them, so they will think it’s weird if you get mad when they don’t answer them.)
Do you think it’s “not that hard” to get a nursing degree or a teaching credential?
Not for most people, no. Nursing can be hard to get into, but anyone motivated with a half-decent brain can do it.
But as I mentioned before: you don’t have to become a nurse or teacher to be of value to the human race, so don’t get stuck on these two examples, as that is what they are: examples. There are many other jobs that benefit society.
Do you think 50k$/year pre tax, the average starting salary for a teacher, is a livable wage?
Yes. Let me ask you a question: do you think all starting teachers die? Or live in the street? (Don’t answer, this is another rhetorical one, it’s supposed to make you think about something you’re not getting!)
- Comment on get a job you loser 6 days ago:
Thanks, I kinda liked it too.
But check out the other one.
- Comment on get a job you loser 6 days ago:
Gee man IDK, I’m not the one calling people weird for making a valid point…
- Comment on get a job you loser 6 days ago:
Nice word! Just learned it? Keep it up!
- Comment on get a job you loser 6 days ago:
Which question do you want me to answer?
