Well we are talking about AI users so those are the people we were talking about. But there is no reason to assume the non-AI users are very different
Well we are talking about AI users so those are the people we were talking about. But there is no reason to assume the non-AI users are very different
Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
You were talking about “the people worldwide”. As for the second sentence, im not sure what you mean. In what way are the non-AI users not very different from AI users? Would they too ask an AI a question and then post the answer without checking?
Photonic@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You’re reading too much into this…. It was a joke my man
But yes, often times results in a certain subset of people are extrapolated to people at large. That is how nearly every study in humans is done.
Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
Oh dont worry i didnt actually think you believe that 90% of the world use AI. I just like to use flippant comments as a jumping-off point to provide actual numbers.
This doesnt work. AI users arent a subset of non-AI users. Thats like doing a medicinal study for dick-hard-pills on a few men and upon discovering it a success, declaring: now every man, woman and child will have a hard dick at their leisure.
Photonic@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Well that’s because women usually don’t have a dick. That is a big difference.
I said there is no reason to assume non-AI users would behave differently. If you have a reason to assume non-AI users would behave differently you should state that reason. Now it’s just an empty statement of “that doesn’t work”.