You’re reading too much into this…. It was a joke my man
But yes, often times results in a certain subset of people are extrapolated to people at large. That is how nearly every study in humans is done.
You’re reading too much into this…. It was a joke my man
But yes, often times results in a certain subset of people are extrapolated to people at large. That is how nearly every study in humans is done.
Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
Oh dont worry i didnt actually think you believe that 90% of the world use AI. I just like to use flippant comments as a jumping-off point to provide actual numbers.
This doesnt work. AI users arent a subset of non-AI users. Thats like doing a medicinal study for dick-hard-pills on a few men and upon discovering it a success, declaring: now every man, woman and child will have a hard dick at their leisure.
Photonic@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Well that’s because women usually don’t have a dick. That is a big difference.
I said there is no reason to assume non-AI users would behave differently. If you have a reason to assume non-AI users would behave differently you should state that reason. Now it’s just an empty statement of “that doesn’t work”.
Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
Most women dont have a dick and non-ai users dont use AI. Like, by definition
Photonic@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Yes, but non-AI users can become AI users. Women can’t become a fully biological male with l XY chromosomes.
Maybe you should look at it more like GLP-1 agonists. They work in obese and overweight people, but don’t cause much weight loss in normal-weight people. But there is no reason to assume they won’t work in people that are now of normal weight when they become overweight.