houstoneulers
@houstoneulers@lemmy.world
- Comment on meirl 2 days ago:
yarrr matey
- Comment on Erasure 5 days ago:
Wait, I can’t find the order that says to do this. Can someone please link me?
- Comment on brain blowing orgasms 1 week ago:
I read that it’s so the parents don’t compete for resources with their young, helping to support the young’s survival
- Comment on me_irl 1 week ago:
Sadly, I’ve experienced too many hypocrites to believe this person actually lives by this mantra. Everyone says what gets them brownie points, but few actually live it. Often times, it’s the ppl that don’t have to say it that actually do this.
- Comment on White House Faith Office 1 week ago:
Who is this?
- Comment on Anon cheats through college 2 weeks ago:
Homer?
- Comment on I'll show them 2 weeks ago:
My goal is to never buy anything that they ad. I can’t always avoid it, but i largely do.
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
Lol nice
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
LMAO, two things:
- screaming the same argument doesn’t make your conclusion more accurate b/c in this case, it’s the conclusion drawn based on the evidence that is flawed. So that link doesn’t negate the criticism no matter how often you blindly post it. Gender comparisons do not make for a population inference about either gender.
- thanks for proving i had a point. If you didn’t think I had a point, then you wouldn’t be acting like a 12 year old. Or, you’re straight up a 12 year old. Bigots and 12 year olds have difficulty grasping logic.
Enjoy your “life”. You really ought to touch grass and start thinking more critically. In the end, I know that your bigotry is yours alone. I don’t attribute it to other women b/c I have experience that most are normal ppl with a rather good head on their shoulders, just like men.
But like i said, if you wanna live a life of anger based on flawed thinking, go for it. The world is moving on without you, and you know you’re only pissed off b/c it’s true.
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
That mod deleted my comment earlier saying that if someone needs to abuse their moderator powers by threatening an instaban b/c they were called out for a poor use of stats in the name of bigotry, then maybe they’re the baddie lol
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
K
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
No misreprensentation here. Those are all valid criticisms.
Also, the image literally says “too bad men are murderers tho”. That’s about as broad stroked as it gets.
This is hilarious. If you think you have it right, by all means keep at it. But when you finally realize what i’m saying, I have feeling you’re going to feel pretty embarrassed by how long it took you to get there.
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
No thank you lol
Enjoy your night
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
How is it strawman? I straight up said i believe you in what you’re saying. I didn’t misinterpret your stat.
I said the conclusion you’re defending is flawed based on the supporting evidence.
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
Yes, b/c the stats I’m talking about (the percentage of men that are actual criminals) actually prove my point.
You used a comparison between two groups as supporting argumentation for a population inference. It’s a nonsequitur fallacy. I believe you that men are more often the perp, but that doesn’t mean all men are murderers or violent in any other way. That’s what someone is implying when they say things like “too bad men are murderers tho”. There’s literally no qualifier to that…it specifically aims at men.
Enjoy your night.
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
No, I get your argument. It doesn’t prove what you think. Plain and simple.
You cant make a comparative argument and claim it’s a population inference b/c the comparison could either be devoid of any scale/sampling consideration and/or the comparative bar could be set so low that it’s misleading. Both are well known issues in statistical analysis as well as human biases that are well documented.
But sure, go ahead and keep believing what you will. It’ll only negatively affect you. Why? B/c most ppl don’t like being hypocrites, and to behave like you is super hypocritical as well as pretty blind.
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
Yea, but the stat doesn’t support your argument lol
Also, your assumption of my misogyny is completely unfounded. However, your misandry/bigotry is an full display. It’s all good though. Your bigotry will hold you back for as long as you hold onto it. I, on the other hand, will continue to work with my colleagues, men and women. We work well together b/c we actually understand how to dissect an argument and how racists/misandrists/misogynists/bigots lie with stats…like you’re doing now.
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
No, the argument is that the overall number of crimes is so low you can’t make any population inferences lmao
Bigots demonstrating they don’t understand sound argumentation.
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
It’s not hard to find how low the crime stats are. FBI posts them yearly. It’s called google.
Obv you don’t get how to make a statistical argument if you bull headedly stuck with it. In the end, while you’re busy preoccupied by the gender distraction, a good amount of us are furthering the real divide, class. And well, while you’re still repeating your tired, pointless arguments, productive people (men and women) are leaving you behind…happily.
Simply put, you can’t say “too bad men are murderers tho” or any other derivative when you use a stat that doesn’t actually support that argument. But again, bigots aren’t the smartest lot.
Have a nice night.
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
lol, i literally point out how your retort is flawed, and you bull head through it anyways.
What’s funny but somehow escapes the terminal basement dwellers is that the majority of productive women do not worry about this b/c they understand how stats work. But bigots are never smart enough to even understand basic stats.
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
Lol pretty much. Bigotry is bigotry. You’ve got no moral high ground here.
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
username checks out
- Comment on The one drawback to walking at night 2 weeks ago:
Yikes. Someone makes a gender based overgeneralization when overwhelming evidence (look at crime stats) proves it incorrect, and those that dare to defend that group get attacked.
Bigotry is bigotry. If you hate a group purely based on their superficial membership, then you are bigoted.
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bigot#:~:text=…)%20with%20hatred%20and%20intolerance
The strongest argument you have is when you compare violence perpetrated by gender. But even then, that doesn’t support your argument that all men are evil in some way. And at such low numbers, it’s disingenuous deflection b/c even the two summed up don’t account for even 1% of the population. Sad that so many of you have brain rot.
- Comment on Putting the die in diet 3 weeks ago:
Surely someone who speaks German can’t be evil
- Comment on Meta Censors #Democrat when searched for 4 weeks ago:
Don’t get me wrong, it seems bleak for sure, but they are banking on ppl giving up or losing energy. The uphill battle sucks, but we need to regroup, re-evaluate, and definitely push forward. If too many ppl give up, we sign our own demise :(
- Comment on ADL defends Nazi salute 4 weeks ago:
IBM, Coke, and Ford had no issues doing business in nazy germany, even if they were under a different name. Business only cares about steady and growing revenues/margins no matter how it comes about it.
- Comment on ADL defends Nazi salute 4 weeks ago:
Lol is the Elon response real of photoshopped? Man what an asshole if true. I mean, also asshole if not.
I’ve always suspected this man was a wolf in sheep’s clothing, but I was told I was overthinking it. I wonder if the ppl who told me that I was wrong remember doing so.
- Comment on Meta Censors #Democrat when searched for 4 weeks ago:
That wasn’t a denial lol
I politely disagree about our fixed path, but to correct it will be so much harder now, no doubt. Just gotta keep at it.
- Comment on Meta Censors #Democrat when searched for 4 weeks ago:
Luigi, that you?
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
This is so fkn crazy how brazen they are