FanBlade
@FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com
- Comment on Yeah I'm Bi, how did you know? 1 week ago:
Something that causes an erection is sometimes referred to as a tumefier (tumefyer) or tumescer
New creepy pickup line just dropped
- Comment on Yeah I'm Bi, how did you know? 1 week ago:
Is that when a person eats too much spicy stuff and their tummy starts to glow?
- Comment on Might be fun idk 1 week ago:
Please stop talking to me, I’m feeling attacked
- Comment on Might be fun idk 1 week ago:
Haha, I was overdramatic, sorry bout that!
- Comment on Might be fun idk 1 week ago:
Cool. You don’t like to watch football.
- Comment on Might be fun idk 1 week ago:
I can definitely see the presentation of football being off putting. I think the biggest thing is that chart is the description of shots of players just standing around. During that time there is strategy happening. Where someone lines up, how then other side responds and the back and forth from there represent the “grand strategy” of the game. If you’re into it, this can be a very compelling part. It’s an important part of the game that establishes and ebb ad flow and gives you a chance to try to figure out the strategies and where things are heading, I’m always wrong :). Outside of that part, that “dead air” I think helps generate a lot of the communal aspect of watching it. It’s a time for folks to chat about what’s happening in the game, debate about what a catch is, grab some snacks, and chat about other things.
Imagine something like chess, even less time with “action,” at least is some game types. But it can still hold the attention and interest of the people watching. If someone were to walk in with no knowledge they would probably wonder why there’s all this downtime and how could anyone enjoy it. Not sure if that’s the best metaphor but it’s what I’ve got at the moment.
It really is just somebody without interest or knowledge of someone’s activity then coming in the mock. Just makes it seem like they’re trying to be superior and yuck someone else’s yum.
Hope that answered at least some of what you were asking and makes some level of sense :)
- Comment on Might be fun idk 1 week ago:
This talking point only reveals your own ignorance of the sport. Which is fine, nobody needs to know or enjoy football. But having an ignorant take to complain about what someone else enjoys just shows that’s there’s a good chance you don’t care and only want to complain about something you don’t enjoy.
- Comment on Par for the course 5 weeks ago:
I do understand that, it just seems like bringing up a random fact that has no bearing on the actual discussion and seems like it’s missing some additional context to actually be funny.
But, again, totally accepting that I’m the one it’s just not clicking with :)
Thanks for trying though, my skull must just be too thick!
- Comment on Par for the course 5 weeks ago:
I’m whooshing pretty hard because I still don’t understand what the joke is, but I’ll just assume that’s on me :)
Thanks for trying to help me understand!
- Comment on Par for the course 5 weeks ago:
What does that have to do with a situation that’s not in France?
- Comment on Well, I guess that settles it 2 months ago:
Cool
- Comment on Well, I guess that settles it 2 months ago:
Have you done actual research or are you assuming because it feels right, it must be?
- Comment on Trump's eligibility 3 months ago:
Yes, I did read the comments.
Aside from perhaps a couple fringe exceptions, there is noting enshrined in law that prevents a felon from getting a job. A company may decide to not hire someone because they are a felon, that is their choosing and not a result of a law.
An individuals eligibility for running for president does not impact whether or not justice, as defined by our laws, is perused against them.
If I’m understanding correctly you think that criminals should not be eligible. It appeared that you were arguing that in our current system folks are able to be above the law because they are eligible to run from president. I was asking how someone’s eligibility causes them to be above the law.
I know things are very emotional now and that totally makes sense and perhaps is leading to the hostility of your comments. With that in mind I feel I have presented what I’ve set out to and will not reply to your further.
- Comment on Trump's eligibility 3 months ago:
How does it result in that?
Being eligible to run for president is not a factor in someone being perused for justice.
- Comment on Children is bugs 7 months ago:
Are entomologists known for withholding information from their SO?
- Comment on predators 8 months ago:
That’s what we thought until it turned out that Elmo was the real predator all along.
- Comment on Let π = 5 9 months ago:
Your message reads kinda douchey.
- Comment on The Eurobean Mind Cannot Comprehend 10 months ago:
I believe it’s assuming you’re not taking breaks, in which case I think they’re a bit more reasonable is expected walking speed but perhaps less reasonable in regards to a persons ability to go without sleeping :)