FanBlade
@FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com
- Comment on Well, I guess that settles it 3 days ago:
Cool
- Comment on Well, I guess that settles it 3 days ago:
Have you done actual research or are you assuming because it feels right, it must be?
- Comment on Trump's eligibility 1 month ago:
Yes, I did read the comments.
Aside from perhaps a couple fringe exceptions, there is noting enshrined in law that prevents a felon from getting a job. A company may decide to not hire someone because they are a felon, that is their choosing and not a result of a law.
An individuals eligibility for running for president does not impact whether or not justice, as defined by our laws, is perused against them.
If I’m understanding correctly you think that criminals should not be eligible. It appeared that you were arguing that in our current system folks are able to be above the law because they are eligible to run from president. I was asking how someone’s eligibility causes them to be above the law.
I know things are very emotional now and that totally makes sense and perhaps is leading to the hostility of your comments. With that in mind I feel I have presented what I’ve set out to and will not reply to your further.
- Comment on Trump's eligibility 1 month ago:
How does it result in that?
Being eligible to run for president is not a factor in someone being perused for justice.
- Comment on Children is bugs 5 months ago:
Are entomologists known for withholding information from their SO?
- Comment on predators 6 months ago:
That’s what we thought until it turned out that Elmo was the real predator all along.
- Comment on Let π = 5 8 months ago:
Your message reads kinda douchey.
- Comment on The Eurobean Mind Cannot Comprehend 8 months ago:
I believe it’s assuming you’re not taking breaks, in which case I think they’re a bit more reasonable is expected walking speed but perhaps less reasonable in regards to a persons ability to go without sleeping :)