stratoscaster
@stratoscaster@lemmy.world
- Comment on makes more sense than this shit 1 week ago:
I feel like everyone that heard that theory stopped to think about it. Maybe some people took it seriously, but at the least people entertained the idea for a second.
- Comment on New idea 3 weeks ago:
Imo, Kant’s principles don’t really apply in this scenario, the Categorical Imperative applies to human-to-human treatment. Kant’s primary principle is act as such it would become universal law. Animal consumption is already a universal law.
Murder (of a human) is wrong because when applied universally, then society collapses. Theft is wrong because when applied universally, the right of property, and therefore society, collapses.
Animal consumption doesn’t cause societal collapse.
Thoughts?
- Comment on New idea 3 weeks ago:
Nah, I’m pro Palestine. I just think comparing the genocide to animal slaughter is a little tone deaf.
- Comment on New idea 3 weeks ago:
People aren’t ignoring climate change though, and I would generally think that’s because it’s an existential threat. You’re comparing apples and oranges.
- Comment on New idea 3 weeks ago:
Speedrun comparing anti-veganism to the Holocaust any% WR
- Comment on New idea 3 weeks ago:
I mean I would say they probably don’t know because they aren’t sapient, but sure.
You aren’t going to change industrialized factory farming abuse by berating and lecturing people on Lemmy. People are just going to be more annoyed by your cause. I don’t even entirely disagree with you, to be honest.
- Comment on New idea 3 weeks ago:
Are you actually comparing climate change to animal abuse? Lol
At the very least I’d say people are significantly more aware and receptive to climate change.
- Comment on New idea 3 weeks ago:
Look, I don’t disagree with your point necessarily, but you’re not winning over literally anyone in this thread. It’s just not happening.
Nobody ever has been convinced that dairy is rape and meat is murder by some Lemmy user saying “dairy is rape” and following up with “because it is”.
Most obviously, your primary argument is consequentialism, which many people just don’t see as a valid form of ethics. Many people subscribe to deontology instead, and so they don’t see it as rape because they are not obtaining sexual gratification from artificial insemination or drinking milk.
- Comment on Water Snek 4 weeks ago:
Non-euclidian swimming, my favorite
- Comment on Makes sense to me 5 weeks ago:
I would say it’s both that and also the world just not caring about them, and misogynistic red pill communities pretending to care and have all the answers
- Comment on oops 1 month ago:
Dude it’s literally poison what do you want???
- Comment on From Hero to Zero (Budget) 2 months ago:
Because everyone does. NASA is apolitical, they just want science messaging to reach as many people as it can, which I agree with. Hell, if that meant posting on 4chan I’d agree with that lmao
- Comment on Google now requires JavaScript 10 months ago:
No no it’s more interesting if it’s for evil corporate reasons! Lmao
- Comment on Anon loves Superman 1 year ago:
Yeah 220V is more dangerous because it doubles the current going through your body.
I = V / R
- Comment on Ironing 1 year ago:
🙄
- Comment on A bad influence 1 year ago:
From my experience, discord might have one of the best chat searches out there. It’s stupid fast and you can search metadata like time, sender, attachments, etc.
- Comment on A bad influence 1 year ago:
Yeah, I’ve found it funky but usable. Unfortunately they resolved a bug where you always show online if you’re on a laptop in balanced power mode and it’s plugged in lol. That was a great feature