bbuez
@bbuez@lemmy.world
- Comment on Star Citizen Expose Paints a Fairly Bleak Picture: 'There's No Actual Focus on Getting the Game Done' 4 weeks ago:
My dream is to make or at least be a part of the former
It is very hard
- Comment on I ain't going... 4 weeks ago:
Audio GIF!
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
TIL of the neologism santorum, thank you for blessing my day
- Comment on Where does the music go? 5 weeks ago:
Some of that sound rearranges some of your neurons so that you can listen to Never Gonna Give You Up whenever you read this
- Comment on What else is there 1 month ago:
Oops, all pseudovectors
- Comment on Anon plays Persona 5 1 month ago:
Whatever you do, don’t install clockwork and valkerien skies. You maybe become but a memory to your wife
- Comment on Anon plays Persona 5 1 month ago:
Hey if your actual job is process optimization, you get to enjoy it twice as much 🥲
- Comment on Butts 2 months ago:
Well farts aren’t just methane
- Comment on "It's better to piss in the sink than to sink in the piss" 2 months ago:
I call it IBS Preparedness
- Comment on Y do? 2 months ago:
Well SOMEBODY shouldn’t have put it there
- Comment on Disney knew 2 months ago:
Thats so fucking funny, this came up a few days ago for me after I came across this:
- Comment on Anon comes out to his religious parents 2 months ago:
Okay Mr. Moral Arbiter
- Comment on Electrons 5 months ago:
The truest knowledge is one’s doubt, thus I am, but am I?
- Comment on For security reasons 6 months ago:
Hey! Don’t mean to butt in, but what’s some pointers? I currently have resend set up for my personal site, but would like a fully fledged email server
- Comment on Oh, oh no no no 6 months ago:
Stop fucking around, everyone knows its the bearerstain beavers
- Comment on Experiments 6 months ago:
OP acting like they got a chance against #1 smh…
#3 still lives today in the form of night terrors, seriously wtf is that thing?
- Comment on How did we get humans on the moon in 1969 and are still struggling to get the Starship rocket to launch properly? 6 months ago:
Work on that reading comprehension, it’ll do you well.
- Comment on How did we get humans on the moon in 1969 and are still struggling to get the Starship rocket to launch properly? 6 months ago:
Well you offhandedly gave “elon bad” memes precedence over actual critiques being offered, nobody who actually cares about this moon thing gives a damn about elon memes, so I expect to discuss the merits of the mission plan off its merits alone.
Smartereveryday was largely on about culture at NASA from what I remember from that video. That and the lack of hypergolics.
It may be a long watch but please actually watch the whole thing, he’s very well spoken and ultimately optimistic (as am I) about going back. But I am certain he had more to mention that just hypergolics. I can list a few
- astronaut access to the surface
- stability on landing with a high COM
- number of refuels necessary given nominal boiloff
- lack of a mockup vehicle for astronaut training
- undemonstrated orbital refueling (no bleeding the header tank is not a fuel transfer as per flight 3)
- yes the hypergolics, you don’t want to be stuck on the moon.
If these are “intentionally obtuse” points, well then welcome to aerospace engineering, its called rocket science for a reason.
And Destins point about the culture? People aren’t speaking their critiques when they’re most necessary to hear, people are afraid to speak. How does that contribute to a program which may or may not have flaws (that could be remedied), when no flaws are at least pointed out? Well look at Boeing for one.
The fact you don’t know how risky Apollo was to the astronauts shows you don’t know much about this
I mentioned Apollo 1, right? Im pretty sure I mentioned Apollo one and how they perished on the pad and it nearly stopped the program. Now if you’re going to be intentially obtuse, then I bid you a good day.
- Comment on How did we get humans on the moon in 1969 and are still struggling to get the Starship rocket to launch properly? 6 months ago:
Lost me at the second paragraph, Elon most certainly can be a complete moron while SpaceX remains a competent launch provider with, but to ignore his track record and business dealings in considering HLS would be a lapse in judgement.
Aside from the man, the plan of starship is vague at best, and given 2 billion in public funds is planned to be spent on starship this year alone, I would certainly like to know more details… as NASA does too:
20 launches, up from musks initial 8, will be needed to fuel the craft
Contracts have deadlines and astronauts need assurances
It’s really cringe
If NASA is to a point healthy critique is considered cringe, then I doubt we’ll be on the moon for long. Sure there’s some rashness, but in the publics eye, do you think Apollo could’ve succeeded if they had dismissed hardware failures as RUDs?
Apollo 1 nearly ended the program, yes it was the deaths of those astronauts that prompted that, but its necessary rigor that prevents another such accident. An inherent con of the trial-by-fire method SpaceX has had is the potential to miss something that wasn’t an immediate issue. This can be mitigated, but is a valid source of concern for the engineer.
I however am not nearly qualified to make a call. But I feel as though this video from the channel SmarterEverDay (whose family was involved in Apollo) sums up a set of valid concerns that I think anybody with interest in these this should at least hear.
I want us to go back to the moon just as the next person, but remember: Apollo cost some $200B in todays money, part of that cost was the extensive checks needed to avert tragedy, we must be sure we’re not cutting that its only a natural concern. And we can’t make heroes of men while we’re at it, nobody is infallible, if the proposal is solid it will be the one to take us regardless who’s running the show. Or if its not, we cannot afford to make mission proposals personal.
- Comment on How is surgery safely performed on the rectum and its connected piping? 7 months ago:
Im not going to pull a picture because frankly its horrifying, but your iris (the colored part, namely the muscle that causes dilation) can fall apart with some condition. Which I was even more amazing can actually be reconstructed. Fucking wizards I’m telling you
- Comment on Dynamic animal vibes from this design 7 months ago:
They really went all in with the nose wrinkles on the hood
- Comment on That introduction... 8 months ago:
Certainly, here is a list of potential reviewers
- Comment on Patience 8 months ago:
Whats the difference? They’re still parts waiting to fall from the sky
- Comment on The truth about Canada 1 year ago:
There was no forced sterilization… but it was very incentivized, oh and inmates were forced to. Not the hottest take but nice aerobatics nonetheless
