Comments

• ceenote@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Reminds me of “Jurisprudence Fetishist gets off on a Technicality”

  source

  • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    May, 1998

    theonion.com/jurisprudence-fetishist-gets-off-on-…

    source

    • LetThereBeNick@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      • Remains to Be Seen if Glass Coffins Become Popular
      • Constipated Mathematician Worked It Out with a Pencil

      source
  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Image

    source
• vrek@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  I use the rule of 3 sigma so I have a range of 6 standard deviations

  source

  • Zwiebel@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Three sigma? What is this, astrology?? Six sigma or go home!

    source

    • vrek@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Honest answer, I’ve heard both and they refer to same thing. It’s plus or minus 3 sigma or range of 6 sigma. They are equivalent.

      That said it all depends on give and takes. How important is your process? How cheap is your engineer time? You can adjust the sigma amount as appropriate.

      source
    • Midnitte@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Then you earn an MBA and implement Lean Six Sigma.

      source
• dparticiple@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  It’s a pity that The Onion has become profoundly unfunny in the intervening decades.

  source