Image Description: A digital meme divided into two main panels: a mathematical whiteboard explanation at the top and a reaction image at the bottom. Top Panel (The Whiteboard): Titled “P-ADIC FINANCE where p = profit.” It explains a fictional financial system using real advanced mathematics. Left text: “In this metric, a number’s size is how little profit divides it. The more profitable the crime, the closer its penalty sits to zero. String together ever-bigger crimes and the fines don’t blow up, they converge.” A sequence shows: “p, p^2, p^3, … arrow pointing to 0.” Right chart: A table titled “Crime, Profit, Fine, Fine Size in P-Adic Metric.” It lists crimes: Outsource pollution: Profit = p, Fine = $1M, P-adic size = 1/p (small). Fake the numbers: Profit = p^2, Fine = $10M, P-adic size = 1/p^2 (smaller). Fix the market: Profit = p^3, Fine = $100M, P-adic size = 1/p^3 (tinier). Ruin a country: Profit = p^4, Fine = $1B, P-adic size = 1/p^4 (minuscule). Repeat infinitely: Profit = p^n, Fine = p^n (lol), P-adic size = 1/p^n which approaches 0. Below the chart: A number line showing 0 on the far left (labeled “Where your fines live”) and numbers increasing to the right (labeled “Big in absolute world”). A final box states: “The true crime in a corporate environment is not choosing p.” Bottom Panel (The Reaction): A sepia-toned photograph of a group of wealthy white men in suits, including former U.S. President Ronald Reagan, laughing uproariously together at a gathering. Edited comic speech bubbles are assigned to them: One asks, “Why’d we even need lawyers?” Another laughs, “We just changed the metric lmfao.” A third says, “Fines are for poors.” A man in the foreground laughs, “Infinite money glitch found boys.” In the bottom right corner, a modern internet meme character (a crying, angry “Wojak” in a suit wearing a badge that reads “REGULATORS”) has a thought bubble that reads: “They took us for absolute fools.” Bottom Caption: Superimposed across the bottom in large, bold, white Impact font: “THEY TOOK US FOR ABSOLUTE FOOLS”—a pun on the word “absolute” referring to both being deeply tricked and the standard mathematical “absolute metric.”
The math of infinite quarterly progress towards the nearest wall
Submitted 3 weeks ago by voodooattack@lemmy.world to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/925b2761-9073-4475-89b4-a7aae207816e.png
Comments
call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
voodooattack@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That’s a very convincing argument. Thank you for the insight.
AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Aaaand youre using the very same fucking trash to generate an infographic about it? Talk about class treachery.
voodooattack@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Class treachery? I am a middle aged software dev that finally got bit by RSI; I ain’t rich and I got no savings, so who do you think is gonna feed my kids if I stop working with AI?
Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
You really cooked with that image description
spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
the top of the image looks somewhat AI, so it is likely the image description is also generated using it.
voodooattack@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It is! Everything you see here comes from collaboration with AI.
Mainly because I’m an old fart with too many ideas and RSI to stop me from doing anything with them, so I can’t exactly do it myself with a mouse and keyboard.
Don’t go hating my executive prosthetics. Collaboration with AI can be a positive force. It’s just being used and marketed the wrong way.
No single human is likely to have deep expertise in all of those domains simultaneously, whereas an LLM can synthesize explanations across them instantly.
voodooattack@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Accessibility is of extreme importance to me.
MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
That’s a lot of words, misused math, and slop just to say “if it’s punishable by a fine, it’s legal for a price, which isn’t even that high”.
someacnt@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I wonder if they at least used p-adic metric correctly, I don’t feel like analyzing a slop meme.
MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
I had to look that one up, and it doesn’t seem to be even close. It doesn’t seem to even present any sort of coherent mathematical concept. It’s a mess.
voodooattack@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
And where is the “funny” in restating the obvious without making any effort to make it sound like absurdist deep thoughts? I could have sent a mildly worded letter, would you have preferred that?
MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
You could have not sent anything. But this would have been preferrable to the wordy slop you posted:
Image