[deleted]
Typically the BDSM goes until someone says the safe word.
[deleted]
Submitted 11 months ago by CaptObvious@literature.cafe to [deleted]
Comments
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 11 months ago
TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Not one cent of mine goes to Israel, as far as I have any say in the matter.
Random individuals pay taxes, and taxes fund genocide.
redballooon@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Unlike say what Myanmar did to the Rohingya, neither the UN nor any human rights organizations of note have used the term “genocide” related to what Israel does.
Therefore, per the 3-D-Test, this statement fulfills “double standards” and “demonization” and is clearly antisemitic.
CaptObvious@lemmy.world 11 months ago
A fair point.
KinNectar@kbin.run 11 months ago
@CaptObvious Corporations are subject to boycot, individuals to dialog. If an individual Israeli takes a pro-war/apartheid stance online then they should be challenged, but if they are for peace and reconciliation then they should be supported.
NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 11 months ago
It originated from some anti-Semitic movements. So you can expect them to stop at nothing.
(doesn’t matter what you think they ‘should’ or ‘should not’)
CaptObvious@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Let’s not conflate anti-Israeli-government with antisemitism. That’s a tired old tactic that’s run its course.
redballooon@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Yeah, but let’s also not ignore that antisemitism exists and often is hidden behind various criticism of Israel. For distinguishing legitimate criticism of Israel from antisemitism there’s the 3-D rule of thumbs.
How do boycott the Israeli government?
Aidinthel@reddthat.com 11 months ago
Is this hypothetical artist an Israeli settler in the West Bank? If so, I certainly would not give them my money. Othwrwise, if we’re just talking about some random Israeli then there’s nothing inherently objectionable about that.
CaptObvious@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I have no idea. That’s a pertinent question that needs an answer.