Does anyone know how to cite this in a research paper?

Comments

• PP_BOY_@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Its only a delusion if you’re wrong

  source

  • WarmSoda@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    “Revelation” was a good way to avoid delusion a couple thousand years ago

    source
• bucho@lemmy.one ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  MLA format would be something like this:

  Maneuver, The Picard. The Delusion. Picard, 2023.

  Then, in your paper, to reference it, just write “(Maneuver 2023)”.

  source

  • The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Beautiful, lol

    source
  • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You can’t though, unless said delusion was previously published. You can publish delusions, e.g., in an autobiography, a novel, or even a psychology thesis.

    source
• byroon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Lmao “delusion” makes this

  source
• Zeth0s@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Pretend it’s in the “supplementary information”. Nobody reads it, with the exception of phd students

  source
• Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Hmm. Ask a republican, this is right up their alley

  source

  • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I wonder why that’s so prevalent on the right.

    source

    • icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Cuz they thend to be religious nuts, and that goes hand in hand with being very superstitous.

      source
• standard_error@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  As a personal observation—“observation” vs “delusion” is a matter of perspective.

  source
• A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  the proper use of you’re delusional.

  source
• pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Well, in your delusion you were kind enough to give Dr. Manhattan some undies, so there’s that.

  source

  • The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    We taught him shame

    source
• HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I think you cite Emmitt Brown

  source