UK could raise nearly £2bn by taxing SUVs in line with European countries, study shows

Comments

• Bassman27@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Do it

  source
• echodot@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  What’s an SUV though because the industry has a lot of cars they call SUVs and quite a lot and don’t look remotely like each other.

  I have an SUV from 2015 and the Volvo XC90 dwarfs it despite it apparently not been an SUV, so how does that work?

  source
• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I doubt it’d raise that much, as there seems to be an assumption increasing the tax wouldn’t lead to a reduction in SUVs, and that everyone would just absorb the cost.

  However, I still say go ahead! Even if it only raises a quarter of that, that’s still money coming in, and it means fewer SUVs on our roads. That’s a win-win.

  source
• waz@feddit.uk ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  More sloppy reporting from the guardian, at least proof read the work. Tax £66,610 on an 85,000 vehicle? 3 times as much as the cost in the uk of £3200? I think someone put another 0 on that, ABs they still managed to publish it.

  source

  • Denjin@feddit.uk ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I don’t think a small typo counts as sloppy reporting

    source
  • HermitBee@feddit.uk ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I’m not sure what the mistake is? France charge a £50k premium, so £66k tax doesn’t sound unreasonable.

    It doesn’t say that that £66k is 3 times the cost, it says there are 13 countries which have a greater acquisition tax than 3x the UK rate. As far as I can see, it doesn’t mention the relative costs between the UK and France.

    source

    • waz@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      If it’s mean to be a single digit multiple of the uk tax, at 3k, then it can’t be 66k

      source
  • Zombie@feddit.uk ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    The Grauniad making typos? Never!

    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guardian#References_i…

    source