This outravous
Take a seat, young Australian Magpie
Submitted 1 day ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/b313ee96-d239-4aff-aaaf-573ce571bf88.jpeg
Comments
5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
keepcarrot@hexbear.net 1 day ago
She became corvid-19 to exact her wrath
psud@aussie.zone 12 hours ago
Australian magpies have a much nicer song than any corvid
Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
What about bluejays? Corvids you know.
Khanzarate@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Honestly I think of bluejays and the rest of the family as crows, too. They’re the blue crows. Crows are true crows, but magpies and bluejays and all them are still crows, to me.
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 day ago
Here’s the thing. You said a “jackdaw is a crow.”
Is it in the same family? Yes. No one’s arguing that.
As someone who is a scientist who studies crows, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls jackdaws crows. If you want to be “specific” like you said, then you shouldn’t either. They’re not the same thing.
If you’re saying “crow family” you’re referring to the taxonomic grouping of Corvidae, which includes things from nutcrackers to blue jays to ravens.
So your reasoning for calling a jackdaw a crow is because random people “call the black ones crows?” Let’s get grackles and blackbirds in there, then, too.
Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It’s not one or the other, that’s not how taxonomy works. They’re both. A jackdaw is a jackdaw and a member of the crow family. But that’s not what you said. You said a jackdaw is a crow, which is not true unless you’re okay with calling all members of the crow family crows, which means you’d call blue jays, ravens, and other birds crows, too. Which you said you don’t.
It’s okay to just admit you’re wrong, you know?
JackRiddle@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Is this that copypasta from the guy?
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 day ago
Unidan, yeah
JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 1 day ago
<The bird was named for its similarity in colouration to the Eurasian magpie; it was a common practice for early settlers to name plants and animals after European counterparts.[11] However, the Eurasian magpie is a member of the Corvidae, while its Australian counterpart is placed in the family Artamidae (although both are members of a broad corvid lineage).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_magpie
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
TL;DR: bird law is confusing and best left to the experts