Swim at your own risk

Comments

• ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  With those images, the no lifeguard beach obviously. Looks like a chill beach. They should have drawn it super dangerously, rocks, animals, whatever. Like this its a no-brainer.

  source

  • Tall_Chilchuck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Red hats often have trouble with what should be a no-brainer

    source
  • Sanctus@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Thats the point. The red hat is the clue.

    source
  • dragonfucker@lemmy.nz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    No, you don’t understand. By not having a lifeguard, the beach is supporting sharks. We need to choose the evil lifeguard beach to persuade the other beach to get a good lifeguard. If they see how much we prefer evil lifeguard, surely they’ll get the message that we actually want good lifeguard

    source
• ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Feels like every presidential election

  source
• pewpew@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  The logical answer would be neither

  source

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Well, I might take a walk along the beach without the lifeguard while I call in to report the one allegedly trying to drown people.

    source

    • pewpew@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Even better

      source
• SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  If the Lifeguard is a young Sam Elliott from the movie Lifeguard (1976), I’ll take the “tries to drown you” and go down with “choke me harder daddy.”

  source