Feels like every presidential election
Swim at your own risk
Submitted 5 weeks ago by Mermotoso@sh.itjust.works to [deleted]
https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/1f877388-72a4-4e75-b231-118de1add70b.jpeg
Comments
ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
pewpew@feddit.it 5 weeks ago
The logical answer would be neither
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
Well, I might take a walk along the beach without the lifeguard while I call in to report the one allegedly trying to drown people.
TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
If he’s been at it long enough to paint a wooden sign about it, I think the authorities are aware.
pewpew@feddit.it 5 weeks ago
Even better
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
If the Lifeguard is a young Sam Elliott from the movie Lifeguard (1976), I’ll take the “tries to drown you” and go down with “choke me harder daddy.”
ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
With those images, the no lifeguard beach obviously. Looks like a chill beach. They should have drawn it super dangerously, rocks, animals, whatever. Like this its a no-brainer.
Tall_Chilchuck@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Red hats often have trouble with what should be a no-brainer
Sanctus@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Thats the point. The red hat is the clue.
Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
And now they’ll never be able to reboot Mighty Max
dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 5 weeks ago
No, you don’t understand. By not having a lifeguard, the beach is supporting sharks. We need to choose the evil lifeguard beach to persuade the other beach to get a good lifeguard. If they see how much we prefer evil lifeguard, surely they’ll get the message that we actually want good lifeguard