Anon questions our energy sector

Comments

• someacnt_@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Do I sit out on the nuclear ralley, hmmm

  source
• yournamehere@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  arent we out of uranium by 2040 anyway? op can have our “nucular” waste anytime. why even waste time on a resource that we cant use in 15 yrs from now? super stupid.

  source

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    1. No

    2. Because #1 is no

    source

    • yournamehere@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      world-nuclear.org/…/supply-of-uranium

      well max 90 years of usage. 15 years of mining. and its gone. so you take the waste?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • MataVatnik@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Hand them over, I’ll can still use those Uranium rods as dildos.

    source

    • yournamehere@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      nah i think rectal use of uranium is maga only

      source
• hex@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Also see: asbestos.

  We never tried to figure out a way to safely regulate & use it. It’s a magic workable material that can’t burn and is durable af. That’s amazing!?

  source
• mastod0n@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  What if fire burned down everything in a 10 km radius when there’s not enough water around the specific area the fire was ignited at?

  source

  • Mubelotix@jlai.lu ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Yeah, that’s what fire does

    source
• finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  OUR Energy Sector…?

  source
• werefreeatlast@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Is it 3 mile island but with a fail safe reactor? Like the ones that don’t use fission (lol).

  source
• Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Image

  source