The pro-tip no one told me before my publication: make a secondary email/alias to use for your publication because the spam will never stop.
Let him go!!
Submitted 1 month ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/2a2b0c67-ca2d-42a1-ace0-e35dbc4d049e.jpeg
Comments
cRazi_man@lemm.ee 1 month ago
SquirrelX@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This and the chicken presentation are my favourite pieces of academic pieces of work youtu.be/yL_-1d9OSdk
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Chicken chicken chicken chicken. Chicken?
southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
That’s fucking brilliant
restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Really some insightful questions from the audience too.
IndiBrony@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Get
your
ing
ing
badelf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Did you buy this article from Springer for $19.99?
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I feel that after all the shit from Academia.edu and Research Gate
mvirts@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This is a work of art
propter_hog@hexbear.net 1 month ago
Anybody got a ref to the original publication?
psycho_driver@lemmy.world 1 month ago
How can we know the over-arching theme and conclusion of this paper without seeing it in it’s entirety?
uservoid1@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You can read it here www.scs.stanford.edu/~dm/home/papers/remove.pdf
lemming@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
And how did it end? Was it published? Did they get off the fucking mailing list? Wikipedia doesn’t say.
blackbrook@mander.xyz 1 month ago
I’ll never know because there was no TLDR.