I remember enough from geometry to know this is horseshit and be annoyed at it but not enough to actually prove why
Behold, a square
Submitted 1 year ago by hydroptic@sopuli.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/2fa550be-52e2-4be3-9ed1-7223e8a5f876.webp
Comments
Lemjukes@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Tja@programming.dev 1 year ago
Sides must be straight and parallel two and two.
OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
QED
affiliate@lemmy.world 1 year ago
it’s homeomorphic to a square, so why not
hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
See, you get it
davidagain@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’ll tell you why not! You hippie homeopaths are all the same! Science has scienced the evidence that there’s no evidence for homopathic medicines otter than the libido effect.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 year ago
As long as we ignore the parallel sides requirement, sure.
kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 year ago
And that the 90 degree angles should be interior angles.
ninja@lemmy.world 1 year ago
wolfpack86@lemmy.world 1 year ago
They’re also not actually right angles, as the curvature starts departing from the angles origin. They may be approximately 90, down to many many small decimal places, but they are not 90.
Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
-Carl Friedrich Gauss, probably
Eheran@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Science memes is not r/shitposting? I would assume the person is serious when posting here.
Tja@programming.dev 1 year ago
The name of that Gauss?
Ampere
lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
c/gatekeeping squares
hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
You’re no fun
Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
Polar coordinate square?