I remember enough from geometry to know this is horseshit and be annoyed at it but not enough to actually prove why
Behold, a square
Submitted 11 months ago by hydroptic@sopuli.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/2fa550be-52e2-4be3-9ed1-7223e8a5f876.webp
Comments
Lemjukes@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Tja@programming.dev 11 months ago
Sides must be straight and parallel two and two.
OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 11 months ago
QED
affiliate@lemmy.world 11 months ago
it’s homeomorphic to a square, so why not
hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
See, you get it
davidagain@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I’ll tell you why not! You hippie homeopaths are all the same! Science has scienced the evidence that there’s no evidence for homopathic medicines otter than the libido effect.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 11 months ago
As long as we ignore the parallel sides requirement, sure.
kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 11 months ago
And that the 90 degree angles should be interior angles.
ninja@lemmy.world 11 months ago
wolfpack86@lemmy.world 11 months ago
They’re also not actually right angles, as the curvature starts departing from the angles origin. They may be approximately 90, down to many many small decimal places, but they are not 90.
Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 11 months ago
-Carl Friedrich Gauss, probably
Eheran@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Science memes is not r/shitposting? I would assume the person is serious when posting here.
Tja@programming.dev 11 months ago
The name of that Gauss?
Ampere
lugal@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
c/gatekeeping squares
hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
You’re no fun
Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 11 months ago
Polar coordinate square?