I remember enough from geometry to know this is horseshit and be annoyed at it but not enough to actually prove why
Behold, a square
Submitted 1 month ago by hydroptic@sopuli.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/2fa550be-52e2-4be3-9ed1-7223e8a5f876.webp
Comments
Lemjukes@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Tja@programming.dev 1 month ago
Sides must be straight and parallel two and two.
OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 1 month ago
QED
affiliate@lemmy.world 1 month ago
it’s homeomorphic to a square, so why not
hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
See, you get it
davidagain@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
I’ll tell you why not! You hippie homeopaths are all the same! Science has scienced the evidence that there’s no evidence for homopathic medicines otter than the libido effect.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 month ago
As long as we ignore the parallel sides requirement, sure.
kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 month ago
And that the 90 degree angles should be interior angles.
ninja@lemmy.world 1 month ago
And that polygons should only consist of straight lines.
wolfpack86@lemmy.world 1 month ago
They’re also not actually right angles, as the curvature starts departing from the angles origin. They may be approximately 90, down to many many small decimal places, but they are not 90.
Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
-Carl Friedrich Gauss, probably
Eheran@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Science memes is not r/shitposting? I would assume the person is serious when posting here.
Tja@programming.dev 1 month ago
The name of that Gauss?
Ampere
lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
c/gatekeeping squares
hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
You’re no fun
Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
Polar coordinate square?