Caption this.

Comments

• mihnt@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Fuck Nestle.

  source
• uservoid1@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Amount of time needed to engrave a circle using the subject’s laser eyes

  source
• ryannathans@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The longer I stare at it the less sense it makes

  source

  • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Actual explanation

    “Subject alternately fixates on each of two proffered snacks, before choosing one. [The image shows the] average path of the decision variable according to the Krajbich model for three parameter settings. The decision variable ramps toward the left or right choice boundaries, with the slope determined by the true relative subjective value of the items (here, left is preferred), but biased to slope toward the item currently being fixated. The biases depicted are: high (green), medium (red, as actually inferred from the data) or none (blue). Clocks depict the excess time spent looking at the left versus the right option at each step.” TL;DR The leaning of the decision-maker is influenced by which choice they’re currently looking at, getting stronger with time, until a threshold is reached where the decision is made. A more eye-catching item is therefore more likely to be chosen because it gets more sight-time. www.nature.com/articles/nn1010-1153

    source
• aeronmelon@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  When you realize the boss only bought off-brand snacks for the break room.

  source
• Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  TFW the OP wants to advertise for a name brand company, but doesn’t want to break Rule 3

  source
• Zoomboingding@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Agonizing over the choice of two trash chocolate bars

  source