Comment

Comment on These dames wanting inclusivity

skvlp@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

What is the difference between “people with vaginas” and “people with vaginas of the feminine species”? And what is the “feminine species”? Is it some (unspecified?) species where every specimen is of the feminine gender?

source

Sort:hotnew top

Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
He calls them the “female species” because the can’t (won’t) successfully breed with his own.

source
jol@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
People with vaginas include some trans men. The idiot in OP is not totally wrong. People with vaginas are females. But what he means is (cis) women.

source
- hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Also trans women can have vaginas, and it is possible to be born with a vagina but no (functioning) uterus.
  
  source
  - jol@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    And intersex people exist.
    
    source
- DillyDaily@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  The way the OP phrases it rules out trans men who have vaginas, trans women who have vaginas, and a bunch of cis women who’ve had certain pelvic traumas or cancers and therefore don’t have vaginas.
  
  source
imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
like how all cats are girls and all dogs are boys?

source