I’m sorry but literally no. There are exactly 3 Dark Souls games, the first came out 14 years ago. Demon’s Souls, Bloodborne, Elden Ring, and maybe Sekiro can be considered Soulslike, but your comment reeks of naivety.
They’re all individually some of the most mechanically unique games, with a ton of variety between each other. It’s not even remotely the same as a FIFA, Madden, or Call or Duty level of cut / paste.
FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Souls games are nowhere near “yearly”, and there’s been massive changes throughout the games. How do you get anything close to “yearly FIFA slop” from that?!
LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 days ago
2009: Demon’s Souls 2011: Dark Souls 2014: Dark Souls II 2015: Dark Souls II King of whatever expansion 2015: Bloodborne 2016: Dark Souls II 2019: Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice 2022: Elden Ring 2025: Elden Ring 2
Thats almost yearly releases.
You’d think after like 10 games of the same monotonous bullshit people would get tired of it but ig not
FooBarrington@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Meh, on average more than 1.5 years between games doesn’t qualify as yearly for me, especially if you’re counting DLC.
It’s also simply not “the same monotonous bullshit”. Each game has variations and improvements, sometimes leading to drastically different gameplay (compare Sekiro and Elden Ring). Otherwise, why not also count Armored Core?
Now they are releasing an experimental spin-off that again drastically changes a bunch of mechanics, but that’s also somehow not good enough? Seems like you just don’t like their games, irrespective of how much they evolve from the Dark Souls formula.
LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 days ago
Sekiro and Elden ring are literally just a demon souls reskin