? Am American and really don’t see where you’re coming from.
Comment on Anon eats lunch alone
SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 1 week agoAmericans are fragile snowflakes who cannot handle seeing bad words regardless of context and intention. Their freedom of speech is severely restricted as a result.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
camr_on@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Haven’t you heard? Everything bad is because of America
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Hmm, weird cope but okay.
Soulg@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
I mean I do agree with the first part but that’s not what freedom of speech is in a literal sense
Klear@lemmy.world 1 week ago
That’s another thing - Americans seem to be convinced that “free speech” is a legal concept and nothing else.
weker01@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
In a literal sense or do you mean in a legal sense?
Soulg@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Legal sense, you’re right. My mistake.
Soup@lemmy.world 1 week ago
“Not using slurs is woke and that’s bad” shut the hell up, loser.
SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 1 week ago
This is not what I said. Using slurs is bad. Censoring slurs when quoting is also bad and useless. Only Americans are afraid of words in such a way.
Soup@lemmy.world 1 week ago
If people weren’t so bad about seeing shitty things and then repeating them anyway then I’d probably agree with you more. It’s also not a freedom of speech thing since hatespeech(which includes slurs) is not protected in most places and it’s weird of you to bring it up at all.
SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 1 week ago
Quoting hate speech without censoring in order to denounce it is not a bad thing. Here’s an example of the biggest French newspaper having the literal n-word* in the title of an article. They are not being hateful, they are quoting a chant by black protesters who used this word both ironically and in reference to a famous black French poet, to protest racist remarks by a higher-up at LVMH. Absolutely no one was offended by this article, because the newspaper isn’t actually racist ; it’s a quote.