Comment on A scientific discovery

• Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Wouldn’t the hypothesis be first, then tested via experiment, then after a significant amount of peer review confirmation finally confirmed as a theory?

  source

  • Rinox@feddit.it ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You can have a theory that is not corroborated by an empirical experiment.

    source

    • Tja@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      So, a hypothesis?

      source

      • Klear@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Maybe. We need to conduct an experiment to prove that.

        source
    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Not in science, you can’t. Only in the colloquial versions of those words.

      source
    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Kinda depends on the context of the word theory. In non-scientific settings you’ll hear people say “I have a theory…” as in they have an idea or speculation.

      In a scientific context, a ‘theory’ is a pretty high standard that’s almost interchangeable with a ‘fact’.

      source
• SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I’d be curious to know which of the team did the testing

  source