The main reason of Google’s financing is probably because they don’t want to be accused of a browser monopoly.
Google search is not the same thing as google Chrome
I never said that
Comment on Will Firefox die for good if Google is forced to sell off Chrome?
Godort@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
Google search is not the same thinb as google Chrome. Search still sees a benefit in paying to be the default search provider in Firefox.
The main reason of Google’s financing is probably because they don’t want to be accused of a browser monopoly.
Google search is not the same thing as google Chrome
I never said that
Google has been paying Firefox since before Chrome existed.
Google pays Firefox to have Google Search as the default search engine. Chrome is not the major money maker. It doesn’t even earn any money.
It doesn’t even earn any money.
Neither do the rotisserie chickens at the store. Or Costco’s $1.50 hot dog and soda combo.
Chrome isn’t intended to make money, it’s a loss leader.
It’s a side point, but the costco hotdogs do absolutely turn a profit. $1.50 seems unreasonably low because of how much we’re used to paying for food these days, but its hotdogs and a fountain drink, the cost of ingredients is next to nothing.
Poor chicken.
mkwt@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Part of the DOJ ask is that the Google search business should be enjoined from paying for preferential s default status on other platforms.
They want to prohibit the Firefox arrangement as part of the anti trust matter.
Squizzy@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Which is justified in all fairness, firefox is too dependent on monopoly for support to be competitive going forward
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Google literally only pays firefox so it can point at firefox and go “Look, see, not anti-competitive/monopoly!”