Yes. It’s not half of America, it’s half of the voters. Things would change drastically if only the nonvoter voted.
Comment on How do Americans win their country back?
Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 week agoI’m sorry, you’re looking at these results and seeing too little democracy in play?
troglodytis@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Johanno@feddit.org 1 week ago
If you consider that more people didn’t vote for Trump and he still won, then yes.
PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Please cram another corporate candidate down my thoat daddy 🥺
HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
Yes. The Dems lost this election more than the Reps won it.
And no, it’s not just Harris. It’s the fact they haven’t accomplished anything substantially changing the lives of people for dozens of years, and they fought more against people like Sanders than people like Cheney.
smackjack@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Doesn’t help that you have old hags like Nancy Pelosi refusing to relinquish any power and pass the torch to someone younger. People shouldn’t have to wait for you to die to take over.
joenforcer@midwest.social 1 week ago
The ACA never happened in your mind?
HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
The ACA, which brought US healthcare from an 18th century level to a 19th century one in 2010, was a half measure under Obama, he got reelected for it, he was president for 7 more years after he signed that.
First time voters today were 4 years old when it happened. What else has the Democratic Party been doing? How about the housing crisis? How about inflation? Oh, they got that one 1400 USD stimmy check passed after Trump looted the coffers for corpos big and small.
Look, I’m not saying Harris wasn’t the better, less destructive choice. I’m saying something had had to happen, and people didn’t turn out for a candidate who said the past four years and the way the world is going is good. Not as well as for someone who saw problems and proposed - admittedly monstrous and ineffective - solutions.