It’s technically a strawman argument.
Comment on LinkedIn
01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 months ago
No way this is real.
Is… is it?
TheMinions@lemmy.world 3 months ago
flerp@lemm.ee 3 months ago
It can’t possibly be a strawman argument, it’s not even an argument at all
TheMinions@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Straw man fallacy then?
_stranger_@lemmy.world 3 months ago
The word you’re trying to shoehorn strawman into is “sardonic”.
tetris11@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
I’ve seen sadly similar stories spouted…
Noodle07@lemmy.world 3 months ago
It’s ragebait
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 months ago
Read the first sentence of the comment.
01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 months ago
I read it…
Meaning, there are actually stories just like this one. Right? Or are they being pedantic in their likeness? (I hope the latter…)
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Exaggeration is being used for comedic effect.
01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 months ago
No, I got that part. Sorry. I don’t think I’m explaining myself properly. Has a similar story been posted with the same “I’m an awesome manager” pretense that they’re specifically making fun of, or is the post making fun of the types of posts on LinkedIn in general? I think, if I’m understanding the responses here correctly, it’s the latter and I just took it too literally.
netvor@lemmy.world 3 months ago
no the “xyz be like” phrasing implies means it’s parody