Do you think the holes left by digging the dirt would also count as increased area? Because it feels like it’d be a 2 for one deal
Comment on Is land inclination included in area calculation?
njm1314@lemmy.world 3 months ago
It’s not, but I love the idea that it could be. You just know some of those megalomaniac dictators would be piling up fake Hills to make their country bigger. Turkmenistan would have giant Towers of dirt everywhere.
ICastFist@programming.dev 3 months ago
OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Absolutely!
SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Oh man, holey cheese has one heck of a surface area doesn’t it.
OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Depends on the thickness of the slice.
AA5B@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Eff that and their primitive math: I want to see the Vatican truck in gravel of precisely the size of the increment, to become THE LARGEST COUNTRY ON EARTH, MUAH HA HAH!
Deestan@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Due to the fractal nature of geometery, all they would have to do is use more fine-grained measurements. :)
sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 3 months ago
Lets now measure all coastlines with the minimum increment possible, the planck length.
Faresh@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
That would work for the perimeter, but not for the area.
Deestan@lemmy.world 3 months ago
It works exactly the same!
If I go over our parking lot with a 1m^2 granularity, I get 100m^2. If I go with 1cm^2 granularity, I get 110m^2 because I catch the sides of the curbs, potholes, etc.
demonstrations.wolfram.com/3DSnowflakeFractals/
Faresh@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
I interpreted your reply to njm1314 as meaning “we don’t need to measure inclination to cheat, we can do that by simply increasing our precision”
Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 3 months ago
Fractals are self-replicating while surface area or coastline of a country are inherently finite.
Faresh@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 months ago
If you’re measuring surface area it would.