Comment on Linguistics
mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 years agoExcept there’s quite a few descriptivists online that take that very stance.
Comment on Linguistics
mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 years agoExcept there’s quite a few descriptivists online that take that very stance.
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 years ago
name one
mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
There’s literally one in the topic of this post. And don’t tell me you haven’t dealt with crazy randos on Reddit that rake the same stance
flerp@lemm.ee 2 years ago
You got trolled bro
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 years ago
I’ve seen descriptivists take the position that if enough people use a made up word it counts as communication, but the only people I’ve ever seen saying “well I’m gonna call a tree a xopo instead” are prescriptivists who don’t understand descriptivism.
psud@aussie.zone 2 years ago
There are so many specific technical things in my workplace that have words in the small group that cares about them.
They won’t find their way into dictionaries, but they are meaningful and useful. Some words like that have leaked into popular speech; my work isn’t the sort to have its gone grown words spread.
(My phone dislikes me pluralising “cares”. I presume it was taught in America)