Comment on Frack you, Walmart
DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I mean, yeah - fuck Walmart in general.
But I’m confused. How is Verizon’s misleading map Walmart’s fault.
Comment on Frack you, Walmart
DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I mean, yeah - fuck Walmart in general.
But I’m confused. How is Verizon’s misleading map Walmart’s fault.
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 months ago
Walmart either uses building materials that impede the signal or actively block it. I also can never get full 5G inside a Walmart, and sometimes I wonder if they are doing it on purpose to encourage using their local wifi.
terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 months ago
I’d imagine that’s part of it. But it’s also a big metal building, farady cage and all.
tal@lemmy.today 5 months ago
Walmarts are big windowless boxes.
5G Ultra Wideband uses millimeter-wave frequencies, which are fast if they have a clear line to the tower…but don’t penetrate material well.
www.5gamericas.org/here-comes-millimeter-wave/
Kaboom@reddthat.com 5 months ago
I get it bad in any large store, mainly because its a very large metal box. Its basically a faraday cage.
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
Nope. I know they do that. This was taken in the parking lot. I am starting to suspect there is something on the roof that is disrupting good cell signal.
Moonrise2473@feddit.it 5 months ago
Or maybe the service is degraded because there are thousands of people connecting to the same cell and Verizon can’t justify the $$$ of placing more transceivers/bandwidth in a supermarket placed in the middle of nowhere with zero residents.
I don’t think Walmart is willing to pay millions in fines from the FCC by installing a 5g jammer because reasons
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
You make a couple of good points, however you may want to double check your knowledge of Eastern Massachusetts population densities. I also don’t think Walmart gives two shits about paltry FCC fines, because forcing you into their wifi where you are required to agree to a ridiculous amount of data sharing, is certainly a lucrative proposition for them.
Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 months ago
That would be highly illegal on a federal level.