Comment on 🔔 SHAME 🔔

Matriks404@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• Klear@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Infinity. Checkmate.

  source

  • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Infinity plus 1.

    source

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Oh yeah??? Infinity plus 2. Get destroyed.

      source

      • weker01@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Infinity + infinity = 2 * infinity 3 * infinity … Infinity * infinity = infinity^2 Infinity^3 … Infinity^infinity …

        If infinity is the “first” i.e. Natural infinity than those are all well defined things (Ordinals)

        source
• kogasa@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I dunno about proving you wrong, but the fact that you can comfortably say there is no largest natural number is kind of a belief in infinity

  source

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That seems more like an engine limitation than proof of infinity, to me anyway.

    source

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Quite the opposite imo, if there was a definite “largest number”, it would be an engine limitation. It is literally an actual issue with numbers representations in computers.

      Now, some aspect of quantum physics really feel like IRL engine limitations though

      source