You don’t need a sense of numbers, in the abstract mathematical way humans use, to count.
Maybe a human child can’t count to 1000 but they could be taught to put a BB inside a jar every step they take. Then they can take a BB back out of the jar at every step on the way back. When the jar is empty, they’re near home. Even if they can’t count at all, they can keep track of thousands of steps this way given enough attention span and stamina.
Then, just imagine, instead of a BB’s in a jar it’s some chemical signal in the brain.
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
I don’t see why not. Storing a count is not so complex and the animal kingdom is filled with impressive (to our perception) mental fears (like the dedicated neurones for each octopus tentacles).
Ironically, I find the act of following a pheromone trail counting steps way simpler than them having detailed mappings of their surroundings.
kshade@lemmy.world 7 months ago
The next question is going to be what the maximum number of steps an ant can store is and what happens when it overflows…
Classy@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
I think you’re approaching it too much like a computer scientist. I don’t think that organic brains have hard limits like that, or stack overflow, etc.
Shanedino@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Woosh
degen@midwest.social 7 months ago
I’m wondering if the “counting” could be derived from a form of proprioception rather than maintaining an active count. Distance just gets scaled and thrown off by longer legs.