I don’t even get the writing aspect. An LLM is 100% accurate when it has as many errors as an average human, so your product will always be worse with AI. Always. It’s never good to use it.
Comment on Breaking pi day to name and shame
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 9 months ago
What’s so puzzling about this stuff is that I get why they’re using AI to write the text because writing is hard. But why don’t they at least read it once before submitting?
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 9 months ago
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 9 months ago
CTRL+f, “AI”, enter
but no, let’s not take literally 5 seconds to check whether the AI got confused and included an admission of your shame in the paper.
TxzK@lemmy.zip 9 months ago
Reading is hard too. If only there was an AI that could do the reading
lugal@sopuli.xyz 9 months ago
And we need an electric monk that believes for us
ech@lemm.ee 9 months ago
I have great news.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 months ago
How am I just now learning about this
lugal@sopuli.xyz 9 months ago
The future is now!
Kratzkopf@discuss.tchncs.de 9 months ago
/c/unexpecteddouglasadams or sonething
lugal@sopuli.xyz 9 months ago
Someone got the referenc