because they’re all as bad as most of us and only read the ehadlien :(
Comment on Breaking pi day to name and shame
Frenchy@aussie.zone 3 months ago
Well that’s… unfortunate. I’d like to know how the fuck that got past editors, typesetters and peer reviewers. I hope this is some universally ignored low impact factor pay to print journal.
gregorum@lemm.ee 3 months ago
fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 months ago
We UpLoAdEd ThE wRoNg VeRsIoN
fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 months ago
[deleted]WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 3 months ago
The author is in the comments apologizing for the mistake.
Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 months ago
Editors, typesetters and peer reviewers have also been replaced with AI.
GenEcon@lemm.ee 3 months ago
Since the rest of the paper looks decent (I am no expert in this field), I have a guess: it got to review and it came back with a ‘minor review’ and the comment ‘please summarize XY at the end’.
In low impact journals minor reviews are handeled in a way, that the editor trusts the scientists to address minor changes accordingly. Afterwards it goes to production, where some badly payed people – most of the time from India – put everything in format, send out a proof with a deadline of max 2 days and then it will be published.
I don’t want to defend this practice, but thats how something like this can get through.
Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
They were using AI to proof it
fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 months ago
We all know Elsevier only upholds the highest standards, after all why would they have such a large market share?
NegativeInf@lemmy.world 3 months ago
That name. Being a hobbyist with niche interests has made me hate them so very much. Scihub forever.