Comment on suck it, math nerds

• h3ndrik@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Was going to say the same. Also π isn’t infinite. Far from it. it’s not even bigger than 4. It’s representation in the decimal system is just so that it can’t be written there with a finite number of decimal places. But you could just write “π”. It’s short, concise and exact.

  source

  • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Can pi be expressed with a finite amount of digits in another number system?

    source

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      How about a pi based system, then pi is 1.

      source

      • mrsemi@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        [deleted]

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • 33550336@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Possible, but then the diameter would be an irrational number

        source
    • Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I don’t think there’s any technical reason we can’t count in base pi

      source

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I’m pretty happy with being able to write integers in a finite number of digits. Wouldn’t want to give that up.

        source
      • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Well we need an integer base number system…

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Not sure where you’re going with the decimal thing. Pi had infinite digits in any base because it’s irrational.

    source

    • h3ndrik@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I thought that was the joke in the comic? That we can’t know numbers exactly that have an infinite decimal expansion. That’d be true for some rational numbers like a third, if you change the basis of the numeral system it’d be different numbers. And irrational numbers too if you have a integer base. But I’d argue how we write down a number isn’t what determines ‘exactness’.

      source
• mrsemi@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  What if I count in base pi

  source