Some kinks should be shamed.
Only the sick moralism kink that leads people to shame sex they wouldn’t want to have themselves. That should definitely be shamed out of existence.
Comment on The myth of "consensual" choking
yesman@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Call me old fashioned, but violence in the bedroom should be simulated, not actual. Can a girl consent to being punched? How about stabbed (with a knife) or shot (with a gun)?
Sexual liberation is about enjoying your body, not permission to become a goddamn Cenobite. Some kinks should be shamed.
DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 12 hours ago
chewypoops@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Call me old fashioned
Regressive sexual moralizing is a red flag that a person is a huge piece of shit. “Old fashioned” is putting it lightly. Keep these awful options of yours between you and whatever regressive church you go to, creep.
Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Does the UK government actually differentiate between simulated and actual? Isn’t most porn “fake” anyway and should be presumed to be simulated?
SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 hours ago
Disagree.
Some people are into that.
cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
yes. no. no.
any other questions?
HereIAm@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Too bad they made “simulated” choking illegal then.
AA5B@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Arguably it is. No one expects to be choked literally to death. Just like any other consent/consent play: you consent to being forced, within boundaries - and you really really need a safe word and/or other safeguards. As the dominant, you are morally responsible for adhering to those boundaries, ensuring the safety of your partner, and fulfilling whatever they expect to get from the play