Comment on Sean Connery in 1964 (on the set of Goldfinger) and Steve Buscemi in 2019. Both age 34 in their respective photos.

Snowclone@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• gibmiser@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Sir, this is a shitpost

  source

  • uber_chicken@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    His comment might be as well

    source

    • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Shit, this is a sir post

      source

      • dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Image

        source
• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  For context, this is a shitpost subversion of another image that’s been making the rounds comparing Connery with a baby-face actor who really is 33.7

  source

  • bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Was Connery really 33 there though? I don’t buy it

    source

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Scottish people hit 50 around 25.

      source
  • Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Зло Омск

    source
• Waterpumpee@lemmus.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Yet bro looks rough for 33.

  source

  • FatVegan@leminal.space ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    He looked good, but i’m 42 and he looks like he could be my dad.

    source

    • zout@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Isn't that mostly the clothes and hairstyle?

      source

      • Broadfern@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        It’s the expression lines on his forehead.

        Expression lines are from use, not aging, but they look like regular wrinkles. Block those and I’d say he looks like a typical man in his 30s. Probably also didn’t use a lot of moisturizer in the ‘60s 😬

        source

        • -> View More Comments