Iwata is just different. It definitely won’t happen today.
Comment on Report: Microsoft explored selling or spinning off Xbox division after Phil Spencer's exit
thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 17 hours agoI don’t think Nintendo operates like that: cnbc.com/…/nintendo-ceo-once-halved-salary-to-pre…
psx_crab@lemmy.zip 13 hours ago
thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 13 hours ago
When did Nintendo do mass layoffs? Nintendo is just not in a position where they buy lot of companies, then mass layoff (or cut salary in halve) when a game does disappoint. So you are right that it won’t happen today, but for different reasons. I’m convinced that they would probably take a hit themselves, instead laying off huge part of their developers. This is one of the few things I actually like about Nintendo; and overall I don’t like Nintendo anymore. The mass layoffs issue is a Western world phenomenon mostly (but not exclusively, just a tendency).
pycorax@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Is Nintendo big tech though? They seem kinda too specific to a sub section of an industry unlike the other companies that typically come to mind when big tech is mentioned.
thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 13 hours ago
Depends on what Big Tech and how big it is means to you. If we speak about the biggest tech companies ruling the world, then Nintendo isn’t it. But Nintendo is in my opinion big and a tech company. I mean even Netflix can count as big tech company, depending on the definition, and they are not as big nor do they something different than video streaming: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Tech
dustyData@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
That one is always misleading. It’s a known Japanese corporate move. As the article says, called “hansei”. Culturally regarded as an empty public gesture done exclusively to save the company’s public image. It works as a PR move, and it obviously did here, since it happened in 2013 and people still talk about it.
But, it actually does nothing financially, and usually none of the money saved goes anywhere. Nintendo avoided layoffs because they hoard liquidity. Have done so since the 80’s. Their revenue could collapse and they could lose money for a decade and still not reach bankruptcy. That is far more unique to tech corporations than halving executive’s pay. It is what actually has been protecting Nintendo from their failures. They still exploit and abuse employees just like every other Japanese corporation.
thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 9 hours ago
Doesn’t make it misleading, it is something that happened. I never read Sony did this before. Which other company did that, other than Nintendo?
Where do you get that?
Not true. Nintendo has huge pile of money in reserve. Otherwise they couldn’t have survived the devastating Wii U.
So because it saves Nintendo from their failures, does mean its misleading to write articles that Nintendo did it?
In what way and where did you got that? Are there reports about Nintendo doing it?