Comment on Rich ppl live longer

• tmyakal@infosec.pub ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  OP is referring to the j-curve historically seen in studies about drinking. Because researchers didn’t control for people who stopped drinking after years of abuse or people who couldn’t drink because of other health issues, it looked like having 0 drinks per day led to worse health outcomes than 1-2 drinks per day. Because of that, many health organizations spent decades telling people that 1-2 drinks per day was better for you than 0 drinks per day.

  Someone finally controlled for those variables a few years ago, and the j-curve vanished. Most health organizations now say they’re is no amount of alcohol that is safe to consume.

  So it’s got nothing to do with Gen Z drinking habit specifically, and the science has been corrected since. But a lot of people still internalized and parrot the “1-2 drinks is healthy” thing.

  source

  • jdr@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    No amount of alcohol is safe? Is that like saying no amount of driving is safe?

    source

    • Viceversa@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      alcohol is driving?

      source

      • jdr@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

        Exactly!

        I meant that plenty of people drink reasonable amounts alcohol all the time with no apparent issues.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  because they can’t afford it.

  source
• porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Yeah but these (usually flawed) studies that have wormed their way into the public consciousness were done long before gen z was drinking age. From up-to-date information it’s pretty clear that any amount of any kind of alcohol is quite bad for you. Obviously increasing with quantity.

  source