That can easily be explained! You see… uhm… uh…
frantically hammers fingers on keyboard to ask CheatGPT for advice.
Comment on Following accusations, James Pond Legacy devs say no generative AI was used in creating artwork
PonyOfWar@pawb.social 2 weeks agoYeah, I really don’t want to falsely accuse anyone but… the human 3d-artist forgot to model one of the horns? That redraw has a very, let’s say, familiar style as well.
CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Don’t forget to say “make no mistakes”!
plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Says “process” in the title unlike the others, body is missing inside, flame jets are missing as well.
Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 weeks ago
Body, flame jets and electric textures can be explained as they’re not part of the 3d model but effects applied to it in-engine.
The missing horn though screams AI and I have a hard time imagining a human artist forgetting one of the horns when making the 3d model and submitting the work as completed
RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
Nah the word process ain’t weird there. Render process is the name of the activity that has been done there, and you wouldn’t say “redraw process” or “paint over process”.
I mean, I look a three second step and be like nah that’s AI, I ain’t risking it - just talking about the word process specifically.
I’d honestly expect them to make 4 AI images and then set up this up together the normal way, instead of trying to get the prompts right for one image with 4 different styles at once. Then again, I don’t assume to know enough to be sure about that.