Comment on Philosophy has peaked. Checkmate atheists

• 87Six@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Well yea I guess if I go tell shawty she can ride my hog after I get the death erection and she does it I can’t really be mad at her can I

  source
• alsimoneau@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  If someone writes in their will that their dick shall be made into a dildo so that their partner can keep having sex with them, they can do that. I find it gross, but not immoral.

  source

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Pretty sure you can’t. I’d bet that most countries have specific laws against owing human body parts.

    source
• abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  I don’t even know how to approach that but you do you I suppose

  source
• petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  With regard to the corpse, maybe.

  There’s possibly a virtue ethics argument against the person doing it? Like, it’s a little weird that they want to, right?

  source

  • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Weird from a cultural perspective where any sort of non-medical interference with a corpse is frowned upon, so we’re trained from a very young age to find any of that stuff icky/morbid. Other cultures may not have that same aversion.

    Kinda in the same vein as we in North America have a very conservative opinion on being naked in public where other cultures couldn’t care less.

    source

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      I’m already a moral relativist.

      What I’m asking is if a person who wants to and does have sex with corpses, knowing that this is socially profane and must be kept secret, is this a trustable person?

      Also, respect for the dead often involves rituals that are non-medical. I think disease obviously played a part in how these rituals were formed, but I don’t think that disease is the primary reason people care.

      source